X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=xrQrxo
	npw2TQIJLh8fNcT6CJ7MbTY3nnU7X1Q3W5LEwv5JkxgoMk6ASrO0d/CojM6thCGm
	sVglXH8ol1ylSxauDuuAL4tzXha2d7HECUHITE4IKSyd+C+6RPf8DQ9JhCQAN5/Z
	1tZD/i6Iz0qCRa+Fa288+Ofck7c0onmfbtGDQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=h4cYVagwBVU5
	dW3fBqRWH09sDSg=; b=GmaLkH+iMk9Iursg1XgmeOrKyJ3Hg9jy7oBTnGfi3byQ
	3eCpWEQ98CDhYlTTCLURiAnFTIYDxSUfa5uv7gF8zjolwTrW097S5j4CfH2REcVy
	Oga7I57LOvIROvECRjlDg1xhJyEaAh/BR6kqmbuF+s9bXW9H/eit0xBX4xYM0Bs=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Message-ID: <53D942F6.10402@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:09:42 -0600
From: Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Simplify AD integration?
References: <20140730134716 DOT GM25860 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <lrbcnp$bg5$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <20140730184009 DOT GS25860 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <20140730184009.GS25860@calimero.vinschen.de>
OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FGNdXrjH84XPhVkcpU7x5sohNEKGdxHFN"
X-IsSubscribed: yes

--FGNdXrjH84XPhVkcpU7x5sohNEKGdxHFN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 07/30/2014 12:40 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

>>> 2. Shall we stick to '+' as the separator char or choose another one?
>>>    If so, which one?
>>
>> How about "@"?
>=20
> Dunno.  It *might* be a good alternative to '+'.  Personally I just
> dislike that a '@' is a less "light" character and it might give a wrong
> idea.  Email:  name AT domain.  Cygwin account:  domain AT name.

How bad would it be to treat the window's DOMAIN\user as cygwin
user AT DOMAIN?  Yes, it means string-splicing to rearrange strings when
converting between the two forms, rather than just single-character
replacement, but it might work.

--=20
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


--FGNdXrjH84XPhVkcpU7x5sohNEKGdxHFN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJT2UL2AAoJEKeha0olJ0Nq8xgIAIDMYmcUSnuBbJ7fz4RE+9vi
N7W1Dc4vDmVkxCMCIMywDtzmhkzSCQu5K8yIHV6rrk19J/vFOrQ811H4Qw4QJUli
gO/ui2ejOdEti73ImnOhh5xqvA0971CmccVPb3Ai5TSjGV2oSyiyAwugWtv9P9Nw
rlK5CfrkwUF9GZV7XLZYkJO0RS3CmU02AQAZ42EaUkh54WpW3BMzz9b/UP7C6uQm
6SHUl4WUoQI0E+1OaYSmMCzEmhhCSotkLroeil/tYeSeZaHR/386fsVjVsUtBWWm
2ZsVtRM+D8vobSGy4EZhUlfSjsQgkrE+wQAtkatr6fU7UJJhioTif5nHMktgR5A=
=Mw67
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--FGNdXrjH84XPhVkcpU7x5sohNEKGdxHFN--