X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to; q=dns; s=default; b=IpwfxSISxEvvrX+0W+MoBPh9J6yq 75E19+jy5l2QjBCF9J0jzWLeL+epQW4brcOo55UTJsRAdbgbqjEIrwDKKMkLABir SuoKtGClvSmtS+u8FRfETjQe874basjYsIZuZh3hOYma+fbeKrcst/tHf5UbeZxt N35Ys/c3ddnshf4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to; s=default; bh=27YrrA7Ue664CcLsgrAxSHsfRog=; b=xK 4jeeBK6nybNh9YyEcWu3WjdB+noBw1PNeVniVW7H28PrCXyg5UPHOheoxlG0TXEr 0JeroizgfVA70X0PFQ4TnPoZKu9/yJuYeGJzdqbarmjfD6kx4ei+B8/snEQ2xEpz W7xeceoHRf/+EpeE0N2MYdwbC49OTR9LNoC0szDz4= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp1-g21.free.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: timeout in LDAP access From: Denis Excoffier In-Reply-To: <20140728092148.GB25860@calimero.vinschen.de> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:51:23 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <20140707110714 DOT GJ1803 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <19B9F8D8-7FD6-4A7B-AC83-BBF8D152319D AT Denis-Excoffier DOT org> <20140709101256 DOT GD26447 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140714095107 DOT GB10401 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140714134836 DOT GA2637 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <79A8CE40-E412-4479-B058-378823313FA8 AT Denis-Excoffier DOT org> <20140716135151 DOT GC8520 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4457DF49-B4C7-4A7C-A189-AB6F4D94794E AT Denis-Excoffier DOT org> <20140718191819 DOT GH15332 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140728092148 DOT GB25860 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2014-07-28 11:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Ping? > > On Jul 18 21:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >> We really should do that to avoid collisions with system accounts, IMHO. >> >> But maybe we should handle it as a border case of a border case, and >> reliably. Rather than using the default fake mechanism, what if >> we use default offsets for the two cases: >> >> Case 1: posix offset is < 0x100000 ==> Enforce posix 0ffset 0xfe80000 >> Case 2: posix offset can't be fetched (this points to a local user >> having no access to this kind of domain information) >> ==> Enforce posix offset 0xfe000000. >> >> This would result in potential collisions in very rare border cases, >> but it would result in reliable mappings throught all processes. >> And, the complexity would be quite small. > > any feedback on this one? Shall I create a snapshot with a matching > patch? I have nothing to add except that i am a great fan of cygwin snapshots in general, and i suppose that if several posix offsets are set to 0, it is a minor problem if all of them get replaced by the same 0xfe80000. Regards, Denis Excoffier. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple