X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=uj5WgRND707FjtSNDQQg2ZkYtPgg729PYOgMsLEe/AqzvFOY/2Ffr WmzYc1oJ2XwiYgQ2N6JLUSQoY/KpiIJdYG5lO0sMzQk3mPxWcBJGJ8TuuHPlYOG0 BwBC/n66fq5zyisdapCVM2JJdEAY8H2dY0r/t1lXhMZ2eqFAGJCbQQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=im0YQSSQE+209Ldp804THOE5x1c=; b=nm4Ed2Dao0fGQ5BW/+ET1gZ1TSAu dWR6IbNDLyZWrjB7Yg1Onb4GrQmkx6VGFx6aMAYSvm3XrTupY05sou95DUGXmJp2 j3/lpFYm3YKDmY6TEhT3GPBoDuwFZJAX52jV67RZLXejoUabs6bHgGBcmXH58bbu CnTRSN/varyjVl8= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "D. Boland" Subject: Re: The eternal uid issue Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:38:50 +0200 Lines: 21 Message-ID: <53CF749A.1315B799@boland.nl> References: <53CF6CEC DOT 6D68E485 AT boland DOT nl> <53CF7012 DOT 2070608 AT tlinx DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Linda Walsh wrote: > > D. Boland wrote: > > But I had to compromise in some critical areas. One of them is the uid issue. > > > > * sendmail, procmail, mail.local assume that the id of the privileged user is '0'. > > > > Isn't it about time to make this our First Directive also? > > > > > I thought sendmail used capabilities? > > Isn't it about time none of them used a fixed 'uid', but used capabilities? > > I thought hard coding a Uid was going out with the dodo bird? You didn't get the point. We create a kernel on which Linux software runs. We don't dictate how software should be written. Regards, Daniel -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple