X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=NfGFAbA6qhFvmt7nB/rDLUYvLWBSWllWbtZLZINRCXa TCMbekm3Qt2/aCWEwhLBdf3S99IlTRzMOKUBKXxghT+VnhokFweo3LbF2jZ+SE3b 2g++1JTf39uWM0Twd32OROW8FY4DmCYldtLMStYLxNNyIo2D3TgpzwadezEVlPB4 = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=vg9HeliTh5sDXde/8OtZYP5GHO4=; b=X7TP01ApKhETrKMNo QbbpMEolikmJu3/wcGUSgJuyeqCMp68X3qICxA7mGY7qdkhhScChEUXvgBiKjlQF HTY/3AbDfkTReyHSsPD+iE6Qse7/9SVq5I4zlOfWTX/DGQ6cgPsPDECFhF1h+cLc BOHRaBz7Z4uNQyICKE6kowDKuQ= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: Ishtar.hs.tlinx.org Message-ID: <53CF7012.2070608@tlinx.org> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 01:19:30 -0700 From: Linda Walsh User-Agent: Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: The eternal uid issue References: <53CF6CEC DOT 6D68E485 AT boland DOT nl> In-Reply-To: <53CF6CEC.6D68E485@boland.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes D. Boland wrote: > But I had to compromise in some critical areas. One of them is the uid issue. > > * sendmail, procmail, mail.local assume that the id of the privileged user is '0'. > > Isn't it about time to make this our First Directive also? > > I thought sendmail used capabilities? Isn't it about time none of them used a fixed 'uid', but used capabilities? I thought hard coding a Uid was going out with the dodo bird? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple