X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=cS9IxsCK32/Jez/rROA81FKS1ny0TN+ZH9LdVv2LD14vmiDJXC/Aa 8vwgIN5bf+H4h8JBKuaNMAZ60whI6Ayg+lz1PpycPw9UoZUQQKQb3X2bZ9fjfYJV dFYAYtdu99cluft5+J7IY6q4QOCvele0AitTex9BkMQvWbeCbhKMEY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=cPgDoJJWsR8hpvZwPcmcHE2klCQ=; b=bRomW4G8ZhJ/kTnCendgn9SLaD2p 9iZAaxnKkIn3mVgzgEflYAStWGFe8x3ZIWDwRwHNwiDr8HUdZDdp42dVvxfUX1ih efgU9+Xy3kHZOQ04hHE9jKGVrJr+2bjr9oEjbtIUDYk3B3kJAWAL5HsvTrul21RG NWvX3bJpZ4Y11L0= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-qc0-f182.google.com X-Received: by 10.140.98.118 with SMTP id n109mr2678861qge.13.1405654881572; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:41:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1405654877.5692.0.camel@YAAKOV04> Subject: Re: Shouldn't 'man' depend on 'col'? Shouldn't 'col' be easier to From: Yaakov Selkowitz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 22:41:17 -0500 find%3f: References: %3cCAJqfdW6bCQ4PLnSO2o6a1gd-veLogad9he9TcddZzk9sw8Jr-w%40mail.gmail.com%3e: %3c53BC191A.5020606%40gmail.com%3e%20%3c1737600071.20140708190126%40breisch.org%3e: %3c53BC89E9.2040303%40cygwin.com%3e%20%3c1905321742.20140708202953%40breisch.org%3e: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 08 Jul 2014 20:29:53 -0400, Chris J. Breisch wrote: > At Tuesday, July 8, 2014, 8:16:41 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2014-07-08 18:01, Chris J. Breisch wrote: >>> At Tuesday, July 8, 2014, 12:15:22 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote: >>>> On 08/07/2014 17:47, Jack Duthen wrote: >>>> util-linux is a popular package, so the issue was not yet noticed. >>> >>>> man was recently changed, so this dependency was likely missed, >>>> specially as it seems hidden inside the man binary. >>> >>> Yes, this is true. I'll add it. I'm collecting a few things together, > >> Careful: right now util-linux requires: perl, so people will complain >> if it gets pulled as is. I'll attempt to address this soon. > > Yes, I just noticed that. The new util-linux-2.24.2 no longer requires perl. Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple