X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=eZP+1V0xaXEFQ2yLt1RHTBWeKLE/xrnhbGPdC6ACkfT ttcFuvHKkm6tYHeNIxN32c1LtQpLvD9015X1/Y2t2tVdWW/E7gECvZCDD5QOdv9O CFWz9Hb7LFrRJ0N1uJEUBFpFF7PbjREE12EMHh0SOLONlWAYLXNBgOHGJ4s1kzfc = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=wb4KOVP7i8M0QxXoP6lzwpYkIl0=; b=mRl7xt4RRVj/m8jDP 6EJVEyhB3xbLhIBiBXUXONUezm5q4qWL4XczrOCvk5pvJhF0nKK9LzHuSD+X7KD+ AByHFTJVlChBgKO9KUsaJ9awQf9rtRMEw99+NJ4yXVuculfyLM8VP9WZ5aiYMOrk 8xEXeI1cbChrhFHAcGD7RXBIWA= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl Message-ID: <53BF929D.1050904@xs4all.nl> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:30:37 +0200 From: Erwin Waterlander User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Shouldn't 'man' depend on 'col'? Shouldn't 'col' be easier to find? References: <53BC191A DOT 5020606 AT gmail DOT com> <1737600071 DOT 20140708190126 AT breisch DOT org> <53BC89E9 DOT 2040303 AT cygwin DOT com> <1905321742 DOT 20140708202953 AT breisch DOT org> <53BE30C5 DOT 7080508 AT cygwin DOT com> In-Reply-To: <53BE30C5.7080508@cygwin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Op 10-7-2014 8:20 Yaakov Selkowitz schreef: > On 2014-07-09 17:28, Keith Christian wrote: >> There are other packages that require a bit of time post-install, such >> as the texlive package. Having the man-db package update the DB >> immediately after install sounds like a good idea, even if it takes a >> few minutes. > > We're talking 20 minutes or more, which is IMO excessive. > >> Else, end users that aren't familiar with re-creating the DB may be >> discouraged at not finding something in the man pages. >> >> That, or else use a non-blocking method of printing a message with the >> DB creation command line. > > There is another issue: creating it during man-db's postinstall only > helps for the manpages installed as of then; any pages added or > updated afterwards won't get into the DB. There is a way we could > handle that (similar to _update-info-dir), but only if DB generation > is faster. > Isn't there an option that man-db grows a database cache while you are using it. Such that a page is added to the cache the first time you read a man page. Then you have a small extra delay only the first time. Usually people read only a small percentage of the man pages frequently. Caching all man pages is a bit excessive. Man-db also displays non-cached man pages. What is the time difference between loading a cached or a non-cached page on Cygwin? Perhaps it's not worth caching. regards, -- Erwin Waterlander http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/ -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple