X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=wF gRp6gcz0DuiXYvYIk8LuwykYsIatGEabjlCBGIdvy/MBHTDvDdnAbSg6oUCBZKlp Stn2dTGuP0sNq1D01DXSs6r6BAZxa9v6oWtg3R+z/LqLUFGvkPj9bVSyYu8eUc3l 6CedsRXXn5eiBHX23xBhVYaYs5PYP1FjsGZdxz3sU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=MTBL652z LHrTXbOGjRVgs6RRqno=; b=VQmwinoS58RCZGy7kWepp1R1pLUihhC+6fDKeUJR niaZU9BjLoATIG/WYSH+JTpxRsC0YreStgQZKyNLKOPiwfpI0G+65XgwOuNfuxvV mLaPNTPlnBOnqQ4EpxOu2MoZuB6ePL0Yv91vCpiH47mW6j8e5AuvGvY9PbDIpwvy RYg= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-qa0-f45.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.36.149 with SMTP id p21mr16372582qgp.54.1403744058668; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 17:54:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53A4A299.6090508@etr-usa.com> References: <53A4A299 DOT 6090508 AT etr-usa DOT com> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:54:18 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Too many mailing lists From: KIMURA Masaru To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Hi, > The Cygwin project has too many mailing lists. +1 > I see real value in only 3 lists: > > 1. User discussions > 2. Development of Cygwin-the-project (broader than the DLL) > 3. Talk -1 just unify only 1 ML is simple. the cygwin ML flow looks not so massive. we know using well composed subject can split them in local box. filtering announcement and other unintended info at local is also easy. splitting non-massive flow to many MLs looks totally meaningless. it only help bluffing "our project is big." just my 2 cents. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple