DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=N/5EaAAXR5v1PK7D
	lBGeSCC5GibhpTA2nDU9BOcoGuQ8e813qRkldm8pUQpPJ3FK6aRXi8MxyuneyXEc
	DhkDOUOzdINpCr8eTY0klUM9XnJa/IFGqxGPzytku+BqTIVD5/Je1GLWAYoUhZEo
	m+0vn3RtSx3fDvaSBtf2TttbbZs=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id: <53A185E7.2030100@cygwin.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:28:23 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Package file lists archive
References: <CAAXzdLUx+zsvXGDfYyBkounDNLsMy8oW1ZmGZtLoOA-XfeDQHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140526201210 DOT GB3903 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAAXzdLUZ-0iR4NR2j30UPJpmr4LfPtqBXfPtc7vh-nY3ZfF9Ag AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140527221151 DOT GA6521 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>	<5395D00C DOT 1080704 AT etr-usa DOT com> <CAAXzdLWmmQEvwpGFcraT=7+hwfYWRzGbj4YxegAoWScZ46-jfA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140617142906 DOT GE7138 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAAXzdLVFNcyFRbWoWGTAaDj8C=LqvMnZQbNgDfTYCeoM=3sUfw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140618061812 DOT GE4920 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAAXzdLVAp_rKLNravSrH81-Kx12TXq2VwwWNcDdxRQxe7Eoc8Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-reply-to: <CAAXzdLVAp_rKLNravSrH81-Kx12TXq2VwwWNcDdxRQxe7Eoc8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 06/18/2014 02:53 AM, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Your idea of "constructive" is apparently flawed.
>
> This is an interesting comment, taking in that your response ignores the
> original question and focuses on off topic quibbling. I will pose your viewpoint
> and my question again

I also find it interesting that you dismiss your "off topic quibbling"
since you were the one that was feeding the fire while Chris was
on vacation last week.

> Do you have an explanation for this opinion, or citations as to why this is a
> bad idea, taking into account that major Linux distros are already using this
> very method?

If this was the question you wanted to ask originally, this is all you
needed to add to the thread.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple