X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=AKyBR2nEX3Nndrb7 JqM5Lcyu0vfsm177nMPHUU4+a0x52pK/S2BoOIwUIh9fGPnotfj6PitVyiPDujFz pRIE5xdicMYq9tLcwhtwfyR1cW+gos6Ppvs8i4XEVIpsiaigcFJPzn6mFwHJ+I9+ gzzJ5x0+ZuLunl7+GavU6+i1dNY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=ikePU4iT5IvUXcwV0shww6 w76Pc=; b=W35NbxheZsLlPBO49CUkPmbdNY7ZgFjLWB9yZ64wHEQBobqx8Bz/Bu aijBUcZUBgf5DeAkJJjTngLbi46602geRKfjPyQXsZQoNT9UsBfhjjQsVa7QYx9v C0jv+yu+8n4+e0Urwx1pNgpVZslxV8w70xWaRzF3N7RWndMNdyASQ= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: smtpback.ht-systems.ru Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:34:58 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <297930945.20140618133458@yandex.ru> To: Yaakov Selkowitz , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Website: Package listing not working + cygport query In-Reply-To: <53A11DDD.6050102@cygwin.com> References: <5395FA98 DOT 5050005 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk> <20140617143111 DOT GF7138 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20140617153200 DOT GA6910 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <53A11DDD DOT 6050102 AT cygwin DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Greetings, Yaakov Selkowitz! >> Yaakov, wouldn't it make sense not to just use 0/0 as user/group when >> generating packages with cygport by forcing --owner=0, --group=0 to the >> tar command? I'm not suggesting that this is the right way to fix this >> particular problem but I don't think it's a good idea to leak people's >> names and groups out onto the interwebs if we can help it. It will also >> make the packages slightly smaller. > That would undermine any legitimate specification of gid/uid. I would > like to see how this is handled in the Linux distros first. IMO, if you DO need to have specific ownership on specific files, you ought to use postinstall scripts to amend the situation to your expectations. P.S. The packages I personally know use 'install' to place specific files with specific uid/gid/access bits. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru) 18.06.2014, <13:30> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple