X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=bJECslaFT5E2uQ6b/LOjLGVvTRtGcClhozsraA8DWZeno0pfqK47R lccKHB0KquC69xFiR2Dq4vB2p8udX/8KgXYRlNMYYNiQAxU2pbHchiHSG3HOnGRj t2xQqlPjdsMS4yFYCkgTKrJZJV15t96a4E8B5Dppq0Yo8pVRAORB2A= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=OlaiAi1Nu0niuPLqcRw7yj+GRNY=; b=mXjMwSB67568Gh+fe09uHW1KnAnu EGvODG/NfrOYnHS234GrDX+uCOXtPkdXE9LcLoBAuTk/jXY1bnkwCXU8Wm59Vdk1 3LosYH0bxPLH+9HRssuSpT0bIEnGABGO3a2lvkXay066w9KB9H95zV13yXQ/8/J9 Y4GTuXE//7Zcpk4= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: rebaseall breaks some packages(?) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 08:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <539FFC12 DOT 1050903 AT gmail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Marco Atzeri gmail.com> writes: > (0x5B0000) is a very low address, I guess your rebase was not really > successful. Such low addresses are often a result of an address conflict or BLODA in my experience. If indeed the rebase positions the library at that address, then a full rebase is in order to maybe come up with a better adress space layout. Regards, Achim. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple