X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=rltHju6
	zE8p9PUcJf5XcT0cPPourRTlIIjqIF/WNL+aKHSydPdRxUbFosCVMQgVwzZEYAnz
	Fe+wCugfooMWKS86o+LE0bVoK7+n24l7F4BKUPpXGKjargSMM7wrJorQkgHGI2nB
	uSq3qocbtNA31lMwCAGWb16Ibp7ugQYgDJCU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=default; bh=mR745WMJc5ou1
	VgsnNBGgUMhhZU=; b=rW4vNdOMovJADKZUBXYSThHyozGFrAkcMnPQ2oBffJH8Y
	JYTSXAEJsa1Q3cV4Ee8tO0P8rqicqCW8amkXTNjAQ8DBUK5fssD0ztbmu573WPVk
	+tJ2l4O+r4nJnt10TY8qPoYss4kWrY/m16HPjHsn/N7AIPrHPGUWACnvnQVON4=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-we0-f182.google.com
X-Received: by 10.194.7.36 with SMTP id g4mr2992446wja.37.1402032147290; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 22:22:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAeCd-OwxNtqEksnnH9zE8-=kNsLszLtRr4_7f4dtLpSz8NUtg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMv+u9JcRKFsORXEEXbtKx8VqMFc__LXJBpuaeL9C4pFsCd8HA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAALQ5r=2=hY6H4jFSg9y7j6CC9Y3+xdUFSt7GQNZE+hKVcoCpA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAAeCd-OwxNtqEksnnH9zE8-=kNsLszLtRr4_7f4dtLpSz8NUtg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From: Michael Wild <themiwi AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 07:22:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CAALQ5rm6XmxNMeajo88hvQBWpULSOrC-P=fRJ2Wc-_kj51T2cg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: tmux failed and got the message: failed to connect to server: No error
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Robert Pendell wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Michael Wild <> wrote:
>> Hi Guan-Zhong
>>
>> The problem is known upstream [1, 2] and I'm also trying to figure out
>> which change in the cygwin DLL triggered this issue. I'll post here
>> again once I know more.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> [1] http://sourceforge.net/p/tmux/mailman/message/32396655/
>> [2] http://sourceforge.net/p/tmux/mailman/message/32400834/
>>
>> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Guan-Zhong Huang wrote:
>>> cygwin-1.7.29-2 is ok.
>>> After updating to cygwin-1.7.30-1, I can't start tmux.
>>>
>>> I find it is because when tmux tries to connect to the unix domain
>>> socket that tmux server listens and tmux server hasn't started yet,
>>> connect() fails but errno is 0, not "Connection Refused (111)". This
>>> causes tmux to exit with error.
>>>
>>> If you want to reproduce this bug.
>>> tmux might work at the first time because the unix domain socket is not created.
>>> But after that, tmux will fail due to incorrect errno.
>>>
>>> Here's the strace I got:
>>> cygwin-1.7.30-1:
>>>    96 1063224 [main] tmux 4072 cygwin_connect: -1 = connect(5,
>>> 0x229780, 24), errno 0
>>> cygwin-1.7.29-2:
>>>    92 1054064 [main] tmux 3548 cygwin_connect: -1 = connect(5,
>>> 0x229780, 24), errno 111
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regads,
>>> Guan-Zhong
>
> I took a look and ran through some snapshots.  I remembered a
> discussion last month regarding the propogation of socket errors to
> dup'd sockets.  It seems the patch (or something commited at the same
> time) broke this as on the 4/18 snapshot all works well and it breaks
> on the 4/24 snapshot which is the same one that got that last bit
> patched.  I do not know if the patch was ever tested as the OP of that
> thread never responded from what I can tell.
>
> I tested on x86 only as my x86_64 install is running May 23rd snapshot
> and for some reason trying to go to an older snapshot resulted in an
> unusable install so I reinstalled my x86 one in order to test the
> older snapshot releases.
>
> Thread: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-04/msg00539.html
>
> Robert Pendell
> A perfect world is one of chaos.


Yesterday I uploaded tmux-1.9a-2 which papers over this issue:
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2014-06/msg00018.html

Michael

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple