X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=QsDoTC
	PyFpOg3C7JLl8djaUhSAFfCCiuLJDsy6FNyHyhb5iT67Cs6Fp7YEWYNbicG9QWUc
	wNBdvoSDO57lkDyXlLVIy9wPn9L2dBpvydBf9g9qkBYbK7mpBeATeQr9kNTXEOwX
	h4n9hCqetDnShDoVN3HUgXi7OwbGeUiADuMRI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=mpQ5Q9oa4QUe
	eTSEOAP+EjU1hjI=; b=oUrrw4nTIUjCGuG4glnMc6YY64OkmXNU793NKO4wQNKP
	4m8NZG9/yVbX4ehyOirYG3S+Fu9KWcQW9HCO0d97DSCtKOjN+dnkoCmOEyeOjj8C
	uGcXkkMzLJrli27S/LYFPA1gejeNvlWVzhSKp4y7zdq7Z6Yk0FYuGvq16U1pAds=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Message-ID: <538F3FB2.6060102@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 09:48:02 -0600
From: Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: "cygpath -u" inside backticks differs
References: <20140604012839 DOT GA17012 AT praz2 DOT hsd1 DOT ma DOT comcast DOT net>	<538E7D3C DOT 5020501 AT redhat DOT com> <e0tcegz4agq8 DOT fsf AT www1 DOT g9 DOT pair DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <e0tcegz4agq8.fsf@www1.g9.pair.com>
OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9l88EoJQJubciBAkHICQckEPSP0D6jIdH"
X-IsSubscribed: yes

--9l88EoJQJubciBAkHICQckEPSP0D6jIdH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 06/04/2014 08:31 AM, J. David Boyd wrote:
> Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com> writes:
>=20
>>
>> see why `` is obsolete, and you should be using $()?  Among other
>> reasons, \ inside `` has weird rules.
>>
>=20
> Wow, when did this happen?  I've been using `` for years, and never heard=
 of
> $().  What version did this change?

$() has existed in all sh variant shells except Solaris /bin/sh pretty
much since the 80s; it was standardized in POSIX in the 90s. (On
Solaris, you have to use /usr/xpg4/bin/sh instead of /bin/sh to get it)

--=20
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


--9l88EoJQJubciBAkHICQckEPSP0D6jIdH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTjz+yAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqJ9wIAJTMVEt6a7SlGMMzfQW+j3He
1a4XdKtI3tzlXQJKXfFwE4NBGQZzcwz6kcAYK/DmLbjmsEYCCM0Ewu9+tyqnNNRv
nDTPk4AGoSt7fuh8wT7HU1cHeqAcihuii5LNZwthsuEOwW16TAmg/g4DfsAsbNqC
HDcNtMzYjP3vGmHkdO3daOdl7qX6TOwZy3I8OK/GmX00xVRbw7dDcUDVYMDXoWrc
GCQt039l4M/pGdC4YKZ8nYnKz0b6sFRihfPodEgVo/UJ3gVl+d+4EFGfHpEv+yjO
WrlJpsXqruPGio47OvqSN95I4g7VkHiZ8/2mWyMDyg1EypK/Y+YBxS38Yr8DWLU=
=RByL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9l88EoJQJubciBAkHICQckEPSP0D6jIdH--