X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=N30rbxAEIl4hDcEu
	zLkqUd7lE8GDMpfRCORj8n5/y0ZqGzc01XhlOc7tObqQUbcDWbzzZC36ZzJfKZIM
	EeF2/dt65Fl3nD7fSjAAL5yXWulauYyEGy++Kj/OQ0CoKUvLykjRqu1JGWkhOxXU
	sFBNmeyGnIFR3WeEpS+j+gmWZcQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=7gVx4kChEf7WxdkW+SCD3J
	GHJdQ=; b=WAKIVubH5TayYeRMwcX8qoildIf0Tb+7HS5EsaGX6azghulSe//K+T
	u5KiRdmfdIPMpgi47WU5SRERBmvLLiHQjHKMNZ8pNmFIxogmK/wtLe6v6bI6e/oU
	XoI7dbaAJvsNQmajY7r+amg/YxEuDsnFXcV3L5orZderYq3Ohg5CE=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: vms173021pub.verizon.net
Message-id: <538DF95B.3060107@cygwin.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 12:35:39 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: RemoteServerAdministrationTools problem
References: <008sFcexc8960S08 DOT 1401771002 AT web08 DOT cms DOT usa DOT net>
In-reply-to: <008sFcexc8960S08.1401771002@web08.cms.usa.net>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 06/03/2014 12:50 AM, John Bianchi wrote:
>> On 06/02/2014 07:09 PM, John Bianchi wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> I can get output in cygwin from this call but cannot pass args to this
>>> command:
>>> ==================================================================
>>> $ dsquery user
>>> "CN=...."
>>> .... <snip>
>>> "CN=...."
>>> ==================================================================
>>> lists CNs but not all of them in lower OU's, you will need to call
> dsquery
>>> w/args for that.
>>
>> Sounds a bit like <https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2014-02/msg00334.html>
>> to me.  Take a look at the entire thread and the reference to the original
>> patch that began this journey.
>>
>> --
>> Larry
>>
>
> I've tried Cygwin 64bit 1.7.30 and the commands work like they used to in 32
> bit Cygwin.
>
> Not sure if the thread you provided covers this as there is no "=" passed
> here.

OK, looking at your original message again, I misinterpreted the results.

> I also dont call cmd.exe as I call the dsquery.exe directly in a cygwin
> bash sehll.  Was there other changes made that affect this?  Reading that
> thread seems the changes are made ... no talk of reverting... so is 64 bit
> gonna get broken next?  Why isn't 64 bit the same, ie have the same problem?
> Shouldn't they be the same? Did that change not get made in the 64 bit version
> of cygwin?

OK, this is interesting.  I can't explain this offhand.

This sound a bit like the age-old problem of Windows programs not
understanding Cygwin ptys but that's nothing new and I'm not aware
of any recent changes myself that could have a bearing.  Given that
and other details you've provided, I don't believe this is the same
issue.

Aside from this set of Windows tools, can you reproduce the same behavior
with some more commonly available and more compact utility?

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple