DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:message-id
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=LzW
	KAV2ACUH0pDlnpcCZdF+KHOJ5J7yWReKKtjLNLKH0S99eX8vuSVbfmKuGSFwZlfs
	UXrlVESgxDKVB20wc8vbPnjtPcNxHlHApuOf9zwLC2afPU7kjqyAzq075bBnHwWX
	icT4kljhnlpuQKvG8fzxThh/tSTSw77C7Zsk2kQU=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 22:50:02 -0600
From: "John Bianchi" <john DOT bianchi AT usa DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: RemoteServerAdministrationTools problem
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <008sFcexc8960S08.1401771002@web08.cms.usa.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Z-USANET-MsgId: XID246sFceYc4336X32
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

> On 06/02/2014 07:09 PM, John Bianchi wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > I can get output in cygwin from this call but cannot pass args to this
> > command:
> > ==================================================================
> > $ dsquery user
> > "CN=...."
> > .... <snip>
> > "CN=...."
> > ==================================================================
> > lists CNs but not all of them in lower OU's, you will need to call
dsquery
> > w/args for that.
> 
> Sounds a bit like <https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2014-02/msg00334.html>
> to me.  Take a look at the entire thread and the reference to the original
> patch that began this journey.
> 
> -- 
> Larry
> 

I've tried Cygwin 64bit 1.7.30 and the commands work like they used to in 32
bit Cygwin.

Not sure if the thread you provided covers this as there is no "=" passed
here. I also dont call cmd.exe as I call the dsquery.exe directly in a cygwin
bash sehll.  Was there other changes made that affect this?  Reading that
thread seems the changes are made ... no talk of reverting... so is 64 bit
gonna get broken next?  Why isn't 64 bit the same, ie have the same problem?
Shouldn't they be the same? Did that change not get made in the 64 bit version
of cygwin?

John


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple