X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=hc0T8KUID08+Hqey kIPAoIWT62rRm/2jgspnvm2206xP9gZDwUysDtgJvwAVQgdHcn5aSSRfMST+6qMu /M/MtIhGqiiI/c7wiHNE9GwlcULMxVHjHB6OcsXdvmTK1DYg3Iy0qwuFe5KqFM34 MalJsN/FRyO4VHkUaJU/cetJIvA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=ZxFbFoOq077DLr3vqbJRWd khxE4=; b=OA0czVz4xIkRPw3ruThsIct2qg5fafa3GvTFbZSu+CXRAvYJpG9zNZ mtylYabKDNcVkLOgqOuqZKaB3Er8KAaEBn7mlNPx+0OwOIauxU1Fh3Q3CO/ytsqL FkYDZrlEC/l0+SbdjuN1efq3PIjfyXTpAR9WNe7bs6p5DjQZ/DoB0= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_80,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtpback.ht-systems.ru Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 16:38:15 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <635595705.20140512163815@yandex.ru> To: "Houder" , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Baffled: is it Cygwin (64-bits) or Windows that causes the invocation of regedit (from bash) to fail? In-Reply-To: <6f9d939cc604437def11828435a67f96.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> References: <849f1f5420ebf77d7a591d6c9b6bfa4b DOT squirrel AT webmail DOT xs4all DOT nl> <536E339A DOT 6030200 AT breisch DOT org> <6f9d939cc604437def11828435a67f96 DOT squirrel AT webmail DOT xs4all DOT nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Greetings, Houder! > Another issue you might run into ... > I was surprised to find, that 32-bits bash reported /drv/c/Windows/regedit.exe as a different file, > compared to what 64-bits bash reported. No surprise here. To reach 64-bit regedit (and other utilities) from 32-bit application, you have to address it through %SystemRoot%\Sysnative path. > Note: 32-bits cmd and 64-bits cmd report c:/Windows/regedit.exe as the SAME > file. Which, of course, made me wonder ... I wonder, how do you check that? > Searching the internet again, I got the understanding, that there has been > been a time in which a request for c:/Windows/regedit.exe was redirected to > c:/Windows/SysWOW64/regedit.exe (in case of a 32-bits application). > As far as I can tell, this redirection no longer applies (meaning, as far as > can tell, MS changed its mind here). How did you found that? -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru) 12.05.2014, <16:34> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple