X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=GWuJh6vkx4QAmv9ls8yAlfHUlKjXPy0Cu31G7YcdnSKHEd8rBPldF
	xQkoYumJSEp9AZ+XfLkyAmyXQgrnwUTrgvgnawX7KB5UmI2mtRi7BJzP4w2SZ5wG
	xZIqES8ZcSQ3CWUpBQ5+I+iRRWKqjwP/EfEPzayZtPZVynJH/ErYmY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=MdVJbSZ6rhfs9/l1QzfC/tUlyn8=; b=o04Py3sEtfFzPFM6M3BBGXfP9xzd
	nZQB+phALlsipH40J1cbfdI1FEvpIDUZxfA3Eji7bwIz5XtF8YrSUNRvduJIh75/
	jxf+wLN+Cf2aH/MJ013Lq/CRc7yRtNiaa7cHcfWFb+Oj18A2HIkO7zeWy+8ZuxXd
	HAN4KrdUCBL/elw=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 09:42:15 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Microsoft Accounts (was Re: Problem with "None" Group on Non-Domain Members)
Message-ID: <20140509074215.GD2645@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20140506125203 DOT GO30918 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <53691564 DOT 1070200 AT breisch DOT org> <20140506171626 DOT GZ30918 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <53692867 DOT 4060305 AT breisch DOT org> <20140507115730 DOT GE30918 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140507124038 DOT GG30918 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <536A3E80 DOT 2060602 AT breisch DOT org> <20140507144611 DOT GM30918 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140508200947 DOT GA2645 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <CAAeCd-OL1U-9CTTXByWx4voR-uBGrQ7zdWk=FyDoREj7NymRYA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UFHRwCdBEJvubb2X"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAeCd-OL1U-9CTTXByWx4voR-uBGrQ7zdWk=FyDoREj7NymRYA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--UFHRwCdBEJvubb2X
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On May  8 19:17, Robert Pendell wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > I created a new snapshot on http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ which
> > introduces the following behaviour, which is a bit less intrusive:
> >
> > If a local account is connected to a Microsoft Account, the primary
> > group defaults to "Users".  If it's a normal local accout it defaults
> > to "None", as usual.  This also covers mkpasswd from the snapshot.
> >
> > This does not work if you continue to use an already existing
> > /etc/passwd file.  I have no good solution for this sccenario, other
> > than a (yet to be written) FAQ entry.
> >
> > Hope that helps nevertheless.
>=20
> Thanks for all the effort you have put forth on this issue Corinna.  I
> checked the snapshot today and found the behavior to be matching what
> you described.  An expected side effect right now is that old files
> still have the group SID set to the user SID as well as all the other
> installed files placed by the OS however there isn't much we can do
> there beyond changing the group manually for the files.

Indeed.  Cygwin can't (and must not) change the permissions of existing
files.  But usually this shoudn't hurt, unless a file of a security
sensitive application is affected.


Thanks for testing!
Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--UFHRwCdBEJvubb2X
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=mhUG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UFHRwCdBEJvubb2X--