X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=DufuN4/SEacjuwpDCFE1K7r7XfiSpjSCMSjaY11SMNG 5ABGC0kT9We+u0tz6LYMe0nhqF6KB3As8SYE2BBF5Bj+4UserA+HkFBTFtoSLFta W7M/GjC6d2AveNRRLuhmd9o1ngqxgjcCw/XViHaeAKlkuMbepUWlndPQ2OMTrXW4 = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=/VooUpjVdLW3wKMmR/K+ljFi/5o=; b=RpRWK0gJ4JJ99vmHy LYWSi55mffohfmJQHkqLh/uRPQ+1nnLuJhREknIlBZMe4fodF+r+8YRHWRLvN5Cc 21QLXR2tYoGS9pPuHyghT1ULYf49MfnCnTKSPrq/e6cXX7jzgpfWTthLOTV6FjoG ayIY05SJ3thdTLGayhFUBxh8Es= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wg0-f48.google.com X-Received: by 10.180.92.34 with SMTP id cj2mr47127wib.15.1399583647156; Thu, 08 May 2014 14:14:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <536BF39C.7010703@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 23:14:04 +0200 From: jdzstz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Bug at getsockopt when TCP_NODELAY is used as parameter References: <535CC856 DOT 7050808 AT gmail DOT com> <20140505123459 DOT GJ30918 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140505152821 DOT GA7694 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <536965D8 DOT 3080503 AT gmail DOT com> <20140507075103 DOT GD30918 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20140507075103.GD30918@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Hi, Thank you about the information. Regards, Jorge Díaz El 07/05/2014 9:51, Corinna Vinschen escribió: > On May 7 00:44, jdzstz wrote: >> Hi Corinna, >> >> I have recompiled and tested Varnish Cache 3.0.5 against cygwin >> snapshot 2014-05-05 (64 bits), removing my workaround, and now >> TCP_NODELAY functionality works fine. >> >> In order to planning the release of fixed varnish 3.0.5, Do you have >> any estimated release date for future Cygwin 1.7.30? > Not yet, no. The new SAM/AD code(1) needs a bit more testing and at > least one more change(2) and, worst of all, I still have to change the > User's Guide and FAQ to reflect this big change. > > > Corinna > > (1) http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05/txtClll38W8u9.txt > (2) http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05/msg00098.html > --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple