X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=YkKkmT0fBCd5rQti7yGSlJIv/PQpwp16yoj6jm5IGbf8fyoIBxeSw X72blB4FUL9FaIMjZhCXsRus3YvXfJENLgG2PjuMSIAzw/I6tRsfPjT4KH0tE2eS y3pBMVjiEJLPhYQjpcWuiFwIxKaqXpxhOLGzl7V0e4a5eKwxV65Cz8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=80x4/nfz722L85VwgX0tYB3y9WE=; b=JD+gVZxBNiw1GLeYP0bKgqIIjHMM ASADMo/ynClPzyY4CRoar6USSwzQNG/QhQASLNBr64mFbmhc4SJX7HoDtxR7j7ol 3uMJBWBXyqlO2tDxXm3CGkhMs7/r2L4yTS9uWSAydvIOgKe/38oB7QIt0+zPWHCY CS1XYyQ9i7uC4lw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 09:51:03 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Bug at getsockopt when TCP_NODELAY is used as parameter Message-ID: <20140507075103.GD30918@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <535CC856 DOT 7050808 AT gmail DOT com> <20140505123459 DOT GJ30918 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140505152821 DOT GA7694 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <536965D8 DOT 3080503 AT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wHmMVWdCgqSO3x88" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <536965D8.3080503@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) --wHmMVWdCgqSO3x88 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On May 7 00:44, jdzstz wrote: > Hi Corinna, >=20 > I have recompiled and tested Varnish Cache 3.0.5 against cygwin > snapshot 2014-05-05 (64 bits), removing my workaround, and now > TCP_NODELAY functionality works fine. >=20 > In order to planning the release of fixed varnish 3.0.5, Do you have > any estimated release date for future Cygwin 1.7.30? Not yet, no. The new SAM/AD code(1) needs a bit more testing and at least one more change(2) and, worst of all, I still have to change the User's Guide and FAQ to reflect this big change. Corinna (1) http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05/txtClll38W8u9.txt (2) http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05/msg00098.html --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --wHmMVWdCgqSO3x88 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTaeXnAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gCuwP/0uZzVirST3zy0M4f079OD5t 8fPq0ekitTGfbGvioqKPPwKiiwWr3y0eNUIavIwZ/nNzNgz2B34aqzu3/77IOVp0 EKumJTrdWNZlUKG1j1enH9Z5H+Juyqqp1lAQ3W7CAENDKDHf1ofN825u+On0ITYi dkh/6Hxxb1rBzCBr0NOFQ4/eUOSlrQKjskPvzyx5AsdOnL2fbWYNmGYPosFm13gW Na+LclEH2TlqtFUp4TxwSxN4KWvIB8I/hVvOKFnBS6KFIrdJRY9daoqL//Bxj/kh pQghQ5xuoPEh+M8l9OATEE5pYy/ExYYSqY72nloD7jVpbZRPpQwC4q/NirYz6/7z uXgc74ZGDf6Z6KOvWfIfD2kAUdrFhuuv+p7dflnPKPi5ZVIproqNvSoxqnRH9UKM xMlHAkxoszny1MXnSquSCzJ66K+mcnp+7wTTs+nKa5Sx0vW9nHmpZ6vP+G5/UDIF G42xx88HonyBAGEmgAO9skKKt/LwGgdJ/GgF9GiiOs/ATE1kHkdsa6azbaAQI2ND qrg1e61LDeMjgehirI+UYg7fk3rUuGfz5XdwunZqGHaNER0oiBRMoAEqBjAvcE95 NMaVhvOe/CrQ8N9ulArUAZUdkRLXyJ461PGVlfr61sjpjuQbrk1tg0TK6KLq5yrB X8APfnqwsOsKKE9njnbP =KMsT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wHmMVWdCgqSO3x88--