X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=lweimFl3ooxZY1qZpogO4S0HrFDHSeNvmz/Z0gOREo4
	8MHdyvrF/grpGLUCUC66tBZT+c3mOOv3v7qG+zoaiHeP2B613eYJkP7XttQgxeKA
	2zX7qH7JDevR2Cbl+v/HRrpKX6tQJ3WaxPB8jU9GoXSVTvmswYFuHtJXFyZCizzY
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=uW907TPOFxgEWxKyiolt3K3OZfY=; b=Yxvls6HSj1Ber8f9l
	ujBkbX+Cm5WxKrIQVlqntBUp7DL+QD/E0GasKlcJK9mAp9moG/evcfKc1cBhQMFy
	aMXpuzvyIxIKLN7tvbr76ZPBZW5S3VO5IerGFtMPllafhvM49ZQAsBVdfjlFWhTr
	BtBk4pAw7eMb1X/xxF4lK9CVdk=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-wi0-f181.google.com
X-Received: by 10.194.201.73 with SMTP id jy9mr4691687wjc.51.1399416283542;        Tue, 06 May 2014 15:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <536965D8.3080503@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 00:44:40 +0200
From: jdzstz <jdzstz AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Bug at getsockopt when TCP_NODELAY is used as parameter
References: <CA+wAnvyrB2ecwdJsvzqmMNjPFTnW6rT0rYdNcXRbK4z5WJqwyg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <535CC856 DOT 7050808 AT gmail DOT com> <20140505123459 DOT GJ30918 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140505152821 DOT GA7694 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <20140505152821.GA7694@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Hi Corinna,

I have recompiled and tested Varnish Cache 3.0.5 against cygwin snapshot 
2014-05-05 (64 bits), removing my workaround, and now TCP_NODELA​Y 
functionality works fine.

In order to planning the release of fixed varnish 3.0.5, Do you have any 
estimated release date for future Cygwin 1.7.30?

Thank you


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple