X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=Z0/pawCOzDBqkj8i8TzldBb97W7Wvbja/Zvcs3DNPNDzpuHf0Zjtb GafuHXaW/7r6JZcx6+wejWBmQnhj+Yn+pi5PlYATO9gwKXJVi3U53C7wYg4A9DsV lMc67sSdrkOFYogbfgLkP8lvHefnUi1dN6eUIZMaAmwSI9LkhNkn3s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=uxGDEfX0Hgeb3P/2LurLZBAICm4=; b=Md1uhyjmAz9AopAP4i3E+o/yD9o3 6qVLCMFm4SkcJ8XtmcsMMgkNTH3mGWfZ0bt5ZLXvADTDwV8Ofqwuu76+GvAjFiqT RcKmspZQV3xRG5nenJyCkZDtqntGM0PnYZ8aMsj/k0J0IXUap77Jj353D2KjLFje 0XxO2C2Q8ChsTt4= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 14:52:03 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Microsoft Accounts (was Re: Problem with "None" Group on Non-Domain Members) Message-ID: <20140506125203.GO30918@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <536796E4 DOT 2090009 AT breisch DOT org> <20140505135928 DOT GK30918 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <53679D5C DOT 5030209 AT breisch DOT org> <20140505144745 DOT GA6993 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5367ACED DOT 40409 AT breisch DOT org> <20140505154230 DOT GB7694 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5367B990 DOT 8050907 AT breisch DOT org> <20140505165723 DOT GM30918 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5367DEE5 DOT 5010407 AT breisch DOT org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Cqq5NadOW2RfLMJ/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5367DEE5.5010407@breisch.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) --Cqq5NadOW2RfLMJ/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On May 5 14:56, Chris J. Breisch wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >alloc_sd (the underlying function creating a security descriptor) gets > >a uid 1001 and gid 513 as input, as usual. But the owner *and* group > >SIDs of the file's existing security descriptor is > >S-1-5-21-3514886939-1786686319-3519756147-1001, the SID of your user > >account. > > > >Why is your user account the primary group of the file, even though > >your user token definitely has "None" (513) as its primary group? > >How did it get there? > > > I don't have a clue. You're the expert. :) >=20 > The ACLs are a little different between the Microsoft Account and > the regular local account. But, if anything, it's the regular one > that looks odd to me. >=20 > Microsoft Account: > $ icacls bar > bar WIN8-VM\Chris:(R,D,WDAC,WO,WA) > Everyone:(Rc,S,RA) > NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users:(M) >=20 >=20 > Local account: > $ icacls foo > foo WIN8-VM\cjb:(R,D,WDAC,WO,WA) > WIN8-VM\None:(Rc,S,RA) > Everyone:(Rc,S,RA) No, the local account permissions look entirely correct... > Why does the local account have None permissions, and not > Authenticated Users? ...because that's how the POSIX permissions are generated. They always consist of an entry for your user, your primary group, and the Everyone group as the Windows equivalent for the POSIX "other" permissions. But, here's the deal. I eventually gave up and created a Microsoft Account on my W8.1 machine. And this was definitely the right thing to do, for a couple of reasons: - For a start, it uncovered a case-sensitivity bug in my new SAM/AD account code. - In my case `id' showed clearly that in my user token the primary group is set to my user account itself. I'm using my new SAM/AD code, so I can see what happens if there are no /etc/passwd and /etc/group files in the way. - This explains why your user account shows up in /etc/group. `mkpasswd -c' creates the group info from your user token, and the primary group in your user token is your own user account. - The reason that you *seem* to have "None" as primary group is a result of historical laziness: mkpasswd simply sets the primary gid to 513 for all local accounts, since that's what it always was so far. - The reason that setting your primary group to "None" doesn't really work (and thus, neither do file group permissions) is the fact that the "None" group is no longer in the user token's group list. For kicks, if you call `net user ' it still prints Global Group memberships *None - The reason that setting your primary group to "Users" works fine is the fact that it *is* in the user token's group list. - One account in the user token's group list is a special SID for a user(!) account which apparently connects your local account with the Microsoft Account. Here's the output from Windows' own `whoami' tool: MicrosoftAccount\testuser AT foobar DOT de User S-1-11-96-3623454863-58364-1= 8864-2661722203-1597581903-2673650909-3269597714-2381787221-1144632321-4110= 357092 Mandatory group, Enabled by default, Enabled group The problem here is the length of the SID. So far the Cygwin code assumes that a SID has a maximum number of 8 subauthorities. This is based on the fact that the Win32 routine to generate a SID allows a maximum of 8 subauthorities, so it was a relatively safe assumption. Not so, anymore. The subauthorities are the numbers starting at the 96. If I count correctly we now have a SID with 11 subauthorities. This is, of course, my fault. In reality there's a macro in the Windows headers called SID_MAX_SUB_AUTHORITIES, which is set to 15. But so far there were never more than 6 subauthorities, so I never had a reason to look :| As a sidenote, the SIDs of the Microsoft Accounts are undocumented and no matching values exist even in the latest Microsoft VC++ header files... - The maximum length of a netbios domain name is defined as DNLEN in lmcons.h. DNLEN is 15. The new domain name "MicrosoftAccount" has a length of 16. Cygwin uses buffers based on DNLEN :-P That's the state for now. I patched Cygwin to be able to handle all of the above, but I didn't touch the primary group in the user token yet. So, if you download the today's developer snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/, you get at least a somewhat sane behaviour: - If you have no passwd/group files (or set /etc/nsswitch.conf to =20=20 passwd: db group: db =20=20 so that you just rely on the new SAM/AD code in Cygwin, you get a primary group =3D=3D your user account. The output of `id' reflects what I wrote above. You will see a group called MicrosoftAccount\ as part of the supplementary group list. - If you still use your current /etc/passwd, you will still have the "None" weirdness perhaps, because the group with gid 513 is simply not in your user token, and there's nothing Cygwin can do about that. - If you want to utilize Cygwin's capability to override your primary group, you have two choices: - Download the complete cygwin-inst-20140506.tar.xz for your platform (x86/x86_64) and use the new mkpasswd and mkgroup tools in there to generate new /etc/passwd and /etc/group files. Then override your primary group with the value 545, just like before. - Alternatively, change the primary group in the Windows SAM, as described in the document attached to this mail. It's the latest version of the preliminary documentation of the new account handling in Cygwin. See the chapter "Cygwin user names, home dirs, login shells". Other than that, I'm open to discuss the necessity(?) to override the primary group by default. But, in fact, I'm not sure this really makes sense. Linux systems default to creating a user-specific group=20 account and using that as the user's primary group for years. The Windows Account technique isn't quite as nice, but admittedly, it does its job just as well. Thanks, Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --Cqq5NadOW2RfLMJ/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTaNrzAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gpo0QAJjlwuAV6VXRGqAhxabElY+L HJwAy5NEy+6bFZQd1BP2nKOvOCTb2FuJz4yZeexlI+xTBlbqZ3dlSYGRR4u5/BF+ trOkmusIag6eNvpufEvtixDhGeV0EimLWk20eohDxE+HSsy56+8B4z1v8/tMYZrD 171ePbp9H4fXV54Xbpj8fHSLpKizEyixNA6PRvSHwUgPwCqhUS13qlAJHXG+A3Ob wcbJMXV34P7pG8JCFWgr3shZZbUiNcPJvqc09z2WkKETlsIMev+MgbQIlfiU5TRm Nv9kV8zNKx25cCcFYRwomQDiciFokqN7ANwChzM140LsyZjElIUbxpnPQF7ft2mk 7nM4v6GLC+1+RlGLFnH7To1dvB5zpCazDrY058kqEKF/fSeTqQwkNmxbik6TGTXt iqpAbh0Dp8/zyIqUAFqIa27TUhrzUU3XZroh4YiHizGRc18aO9iMMQK/AUX0wNVR Y+bEsZizh0i9ahWC0hK67RME+imMMHCju6gLxNJNRob8ZLZqQpuaTSeQIUd4Kvta eTVjzMKvjKPQoSwk0FLvQ3H2g+8KNiphGY59H+Q7fvlgM3aFwa+bZ7ZGa952sw4d LOMvdmZsvNLTobNkv3N0r0fPPj64Xn+pk1Qaza7dXe2E1tUFGYceLv+reKJ2Srpm /1O5/GvuRI2oh7jG7ZeX =zApq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Cqq5NadOW2RfLMJ/--