X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=s/6d8yIb0QZNVvKd EnZPcsU96BX+xc4aisk8lC6tO4NaeKL4dXcDpF+RHaGwjjCNdtFGyduUxTLm9OdI jTktcFy4ADCKYLv/F55zxwwJqdqHUefCRum0Qlp8KQMY5M41asP8IKKroMLpZW9d zmCLeharQHAoOlR6P1SWaAhIKMI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=wAP8/z/qzVr74gyqH0zNGR DO9N8=; b=UEr/+/nQ+AcmwzzWDeshD6iPhGPv6AKvvxV8E4CHmjQL8hBfaYT93p S8cDz7u+CuGjsZ/CWU81wag8Q5jrJYv14NaTFddsrE7wv+wVhqNZmmA9IE+2Cx9s B7rjoQBiJUXu6ozAGKSLeVMwyJ/63QnhecV21eULXZmPsmwl8MkC0= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: vms173019pub.verizon.net Message-id: <53680C04.6050609@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 18:09:08 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Problem with "None" Group on Non-Domain Members References: <536796E4 DOT 2090009 AT breisch DOT org> <20140505135928 DOT GK30918 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <53679D5C DOT 5030209 AT breisch DOT org> <20140505144745 DOT GA6993 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5367ACED DOT 40409 AT breisch DOT org> <20140505154230 DOT GB7694 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5367B990 DOT 8050907 AT breisch DOT org> <20140505165723 DOT GM30918 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5367DEE5 DOT 5010407 AT breisch DOT org> <5367EA1F DOT 3060800 AT cygwin DOT com> <5368094E DOT 7040806 AT breisch DOT org> In-reply-to: <5368094E.7040806@breisch.org> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 05/05/2014 05:57 PM, Chris J. Breisch wrote: > Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: >> On 05/05/2014 02:56 PM, Chris J. Breisch wrote: >>> Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>> On May 5 12:17, Chris J. Breisch wrote: >>>>> Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>>>> An strace of `chmod 400 bar' might sched some light on this issue, >>>>>> but I >>>>>> have a gut feeling the underlying WIndows call will not even return an >>>>>> error code... >>>>> Attached. Your gut seems to be working today... >>>> >>>> There *is* something weird here. Look at this: >>>> >>>>> 151 36702 [main] chmod 5536 alloc_sd: uid 1001, gid 513, attribute >>>>> 0x2190 >>>>> 65 36767 [main] chmod 5536 cygsid::debug_print: alloc_sd: owner SID >>>>> = S-1-5-21-3514886939-1786686319-3519756147-1001 (+) >>>>> 70 36837 [main] chmod 5536 cygsid::debug_print: alloc_sd: group SID >>>>> = S-1-5-21-3514886939-1786686319-3519756147-1001 (+) >>>> >>>> alloc_sd (the underlying function creating a security descriptor) gets >>>> a uid 1001 and gid 513 as input, as usual. But the owner *and* group >>>> SIDs of the file's existing security descriptor is >>>> S-1-5-21-3514886939-1786686319-3519756147-1001, the SID of your user >>>> account. >>>> >>>> Why is your user account the primary group of the file, even though >>>> your user token definitely has "None" (513) as its primary group? >>>> How did it get there? >>>> >>> I don't have a clue. You're the expert. :) >>> >> >> I'm wondering if we're getting the user id as the group for the MS >> Account because there is no group id. Chris, what does 'id' for >> each of these accounts look like and is the group id (assuming they >> are different that the user id) in there? >> >> > > Well, I hope I'm not comparing apples and oranges, because now I'm at home. > However, I have duplicated the scenario and results on this machine. It was > actually where I noticed it first. > > id produces expected results: > > MS account: > $ id > uid=1001(Chris) gid=513(None) groups=513(None),545(Users),1003(HomeUsers) > > Local account: > $ id > uid=1007(cjb) gid=513(None) groups=513(None),545(Users),1003(HomeUsers) OK, thanks. That answers my question but doesn't give any insight into the original issue. :-( -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple