DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=J+/lUT
	37fxe3dG6Ho3u/hyKKwpDG0uY9ZOrU+XK0HrURy0H97iqPruE/K4ZnoAyQI6p6rb
	Tb6hx7OXT5HL20xMpuVmIBDX1r30xFsIAHjJiqAZGP3wosrGVry0HjwSeGzwnxi+
	CkNtUS5Z85TSlRGwX39iduGdYp67rD0iGM1Yc=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <535B00FA.6020500@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 08:42:34 +0800
From: JonY <10walls AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: GIT (was: Coverity Scan)
References: <0C723FEB5B4E5642B25B451BA57E2730751B9B9A AT S1P5DAG3C DOT EXCHPROD DOT USA DOT NET> <139855391 DOT 20140426032748 AT yandex DOT ru>
In-Reply-To: <139855391.20140426032748@yandex.ru>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v2hgch2s16mQKcgBdVL9MqlAhrsFlS303"

--v2hgch2s16mQKcgBdVL9MqlAhrsFlS303
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 4/26/2014 07:27, Andrey Repin wrote:
> This is exactly what makes me dislike it strongly. This, and idiotic mode=
l of
> copying whole repository to my machine, when I only want to glance at the
> source code, and find the culprit of my current issues.
> I've spent 3 hours downloading a 200Mb repo of a project, where the Subve=
rsion
> client pulled 4 or 5Mb HEAD of it in like 10 minutes, once I realized wha=
t an
> idiotic weight I pulled and went to google to see if it can be done bette=
r.
> And "fine control" doesn't mix with "project consistency" at all.
> Subversion is aimed at versioning of a whole project, in a supposedly
> consistent state at each version. What can be more "fine" than this, is b=
eyond
> my understanding.

git clone --depth 1 if you don't care about history.

> You can still commit separate files from working copy, though, but this
> practice is discouraged for the greater good of the project you develop.
>=20

Don't you need to git add individual files to mark for commit? Won't you
get into the same problems if you forgot to commit files in SVN?


--v2hgch2s16mQKcgBdVL9MqlAhrsFlS303
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32)
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=o6x5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--v2hgch2s16mQKcgBdVL9MqlAhrsFlS303--