X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=U1Rp/cbvPrFJz5Lz IduGCnuRI9ok5KPqBpbIwRp8pLAa8waOqKNzUOaDc/prN1OE98KPmLjm8htJQGxP FHnkChgaA64aiKtma3QYWeQ/XdVT+J3An6VD+KRSAJQ0ccE5vFU2l8/gw/6Uqfpm rJJfwNnGf1lFyu89VK9eRXbO2hY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=1i0uUGK2bex9SN7DZJFQCg HWKIs=; b=GBXEGlhk6jYEf+fGSMvTBphnaYtXGJhKCQujuL60wntbl2Gt9DzQSx 8KACqnraExlJ7q/EOtQgV4Uzz4ipGwnP37L4IvacxaoN/4zVLrDVwx3RJLSHWqi9 +UtetezuGs48zKLGlSSv3vUyEl5kI7rl0JbfepSevgXF/24ov0Sns= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: vms173019pub.verizon.net Message-id: <535192CE.6020909@cygwin.com> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 17:02:06 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: dos telnet.exe not showing up with cygwin "ls" References: <20140418041455 DOT GA2382 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 04/18/2014 04:06 PM, Andy wrote: > The real question (I should have emphasized this in my original post) is how > a file can be invisible to cygwin, but not to Windows explorer or the DOS > shell. It's a general question that goes beyond telnet. The fact that this > is possible is (I think) something to be aware of because it means that what > you see using bash could very well be a low fidelity reflection of what's in > the underlying Windows file system. I mean low fidelity in a relative sense > -- it means there's one more way for what's seen via bash to differ from the > underlying Windows file system. Can you clarify your question here a bit? Are you using a 32-bit Cygwin and confused by the fact that you don't see 64-bit stuff with it? Forgive me if I assumed too much about the issue you're seeing. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple