X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to
	:references:date; q=dns; s=default; b=EQA6Q9cVApFEFr9b4KhW1AgZWs
	/0TuF0qZs0UQDC/Z6xM78mHwMa5qqqlVhPl6yx0kyOCs91zJ1D3ChtQnJLwUcurg
	X4o3PpwcxgieeCgXAa77TwkQsAOB0m8dWHOGrVbomLr+WbW5WO0q5nWBM14ZSGh0
	/JK+Be/kTeVQQ/MiE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to
	:references:date; s=default; bh=AAnje9/Y1TJdgTVtoQKAuB8XiBU=; b=
	widxItII8yZYixofsoCajI7JGyFkbwnx9z6lPVjoFl5vgOPzWTTRRqM8/Ft5bldr
	Ja3DUtHIHOWYNe14Y63LwLtPYyybBFS8spEjRnEE6argdTAwLdAlbszMdVR0Cxcj
	80ZI/2lmwH89qO6y2/Q1sagvU2QZEYH2U/tSq7IjoBg=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: nm4-vm5.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Message-ID: <217266.53270.bm@smtp112.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
X-Yahoo-SMTP: BDVluRmswBBpb4.UU1_zlPhs_ysfXcBVjBNXyWpyS_6pPgE-
X-Rocket-Received: from solabel10.tnolan.com (tednolan AT 74 DOT 243 DOT 198 DOT 236 with plain [98.138.84.52])        by smtp112.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Apr 2014 15:25:26 -0700 PDT
From: tednolan AT bellsouth DOT net
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Wow, just hit RCS bug
In-reply-to: <CAFWoy7HdXgKXnPKNTsEUo38ttbj=fCR4kRRoLnSyxdvFuoffTA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <694832 DOT 7961 DOT bm AT smtp113 DOT sbc DOT mail DOT ne1 DOT yahoo DOT com> <87bnw12nuu DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <112218 DOT 65526 DOT bm AT smtp118 DOT sbc DOT mail DOT ne1 DOT yahoo DOT com> <CAFWoy7HdXgKXnPKNTsEUo38ttbj=fCR4kRRoLnSyxdvFuoffTA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Comments: In-reply-to Keith Christian <keith1christian AT gmail DOT com>   message dated "Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:20:11 -0600."
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 17:53:17 -0400
X-IsSubscribed: yes

In message <CAFWoy7HdXgKXnPKNTsEUo38ttbj=fCR4kRRoLnSyxdvFuoffTA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
you write:
>RCS does a great job for smaller projects when I don't need the
>overhead of any of the popular larger systems.  It has saved me many
>times when I'm working on a short document or a set of scripts on my
>desktop machine.
>
>I'd miss it if it were removed simply due to the lack of handling
>10Meg of diffs or similar.  Wonder if this bug could be fixed some
>way?
>

Well, I agree, or I wouldn't be using RCS in the first place.
But even though I'm the only coder on the project, I've managed to work
the main library file up to 256+ K, and I suspect it's not at all
rare for RCS projects to have files in that range.

256K is the key number, not 10M.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple