X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=e1 hoOtXYVIqhyWEsJDq9+oW0K3V/nYOsyDPJEhllX6y0yg+OheR6pAcFMRs1h60vYj Iz48TPhUTH6pMY8FnSFTmPZeYR4eWGGgSNRpJrT/40rf/air3ZiTnJI4C0GDnhqO bCSHZWzJvxz4XXHSty9d21u9fYUzjgxKB5jrMiaMU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=UpVQFnoD qQ/HVx+m86ygbEQxyN0=; b=QsZjU5+cDEpCiPtHS9RVnfUZsKgQUy8he18DWzYR eLwR7kafFI7POKKfmO+r8atHnzAWM2J3/H1JOm9+/nCXKUrZddn227vwTWfFrsdT 6Zh7h8WFdTFP3r1WFeTZLQTuLLuQUbCuASEtjsP3HMIUXsW/OXifaRb36w4mb38n 0C0= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ie0-f177.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.57.109 with SMTP id h13mr7547459igq.3.1397686811741; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:20:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <112218.65526.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <694832 DOT 7961 DOT bm AT smtp113 DOT sbc DOT mail DOT ne1 DOT yahoo DOT com> <87bnw12nuu DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <112218 DOT 65526 DOT bm AT smtp118 DOT sbc DOT mail DOT ne1 DOT yahoo DOT com> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:20:11 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Wow, just hit RCS bug From: Keith Christian To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes RCS does a great job for smaller projects when I don't need the overhead of any of the popular larger systems. It has saved me many times when I'm working on a short document or a set of scripts on my desktop machine. I'd miss it if it were removed simply due to the lack of handling 10Meg of diffs or similar. Wonder if this bug could be fixed some way? On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:05 AM, wrote: > In message <87bnw12nuu DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>you write: >>tednolan AT bellsouth DOT net writes: >>> Just for the record, the suggested env var fix >>> >>> RCS_MEM_LIMIT=0 >>> >>> to "force stdio" does not work for me, but the >> >>That was never suggested as a fix, but to show that the problem occurs >>with files much less than 256kiB size when forcing the code path through >>stdio (which is what the "0" setting does). The RCS test suite passes >>on Cygwin since it never actively tests this code path. >> >>http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/142346 >> >>> RCS_MEM_LIMIT=10240 >>> >>> to allow 10megs of diffs does.. >> >>Which will fail once you happen upon a diff that gets that large. >> > > Ah, OK -- I was just looking for a fix or workaround and didn't read > what the "=0" was supposed to do closely enough. > > I can't see ever getting up to 10M of diffs, but still I consider > it an "existential" level bug for a version control system and think > the package should be removed. It's almost as bad as if "ls -l foo" > unlinked "foo". > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple