X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=vdntSnppSUmjX2BgrdDLIWaxeVY6r+qjX6ki2e00dNW8mtsZJI5BF
	UINv+klaVn4dkBKuwFbkI4C0abIB9Tr6opaWOMQgDbUsB0QFqs/+OHfZ9ZfkuZpr
	1n83ms73RaMx88IjyH9glAro4eyxBCCkFRtV8ZC18C1Y2Fa7Xbp1z8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=YVLmo53gCkepZtUA2iW5HuQkrKU=; b=yDw/1kIIfBGA4ecG079amnxpqo6z
	mSCtDRCSDY44KmM30HN8OWpO691hOTcAWo/WRtQgoZ8Os3iRfaUZ6mHAZOcukGdJ
	BEG4mBXdEitsN+EY4rEl+T3GUioZKmZ6LA4jON5AEFbusSGk7fOnTksCFhdvNKOz
	9kT53FUwg2d+mOA=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/r9tyG5mjuOMtTiYqZDhd1
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:09:31 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: We need steenking patches (Re: Cygwin kill utility...)
Message-ID: <20140411170931.GA7818@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20140409032833 DOT GA2351 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAAXzdLUk3L3zRcGoLmb=GM-rnF7K8Y=fqNA8n9gfgVhja5TL2Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20140409055117 DOT GA1878 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CAAXzdLXxAnB0JYHuvJj44ZAT=Uc-G12Xt+xsirnmiPBkOJ4U-w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <53457A4C DOT 1050104 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20140409170517 DOT GA6319 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <53472600 DOT 7050008 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> <20140411021742 DOT GA6242 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <53479351 DOT 4050703 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> <20140411121042 DOT GB23281 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140411121042.GB23281@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 02:10:42PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Apr 11 09:01, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>The newlib license is liberal enough for RedHat to relicense it under
>>their own terms?
>
>That's it, more or less.

I have never seen how you can have it both ways, legally speaking.  I
was told not to worry about it when I was at Red Hat but no one ever
gave me a convincing explanation.  Since there are no assignments in
newlib land, it just relies on BSD-like licensing.  I don't see why
Cygwin can't do the same.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple