X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=I6 1m5TbpAI/OFeZhuh7YAUL1XPLmmRopin0+uV5ovJuwqVhqB5P/0n/jlZoXdxRY6A 8zuda2ZHNxOBJXCVelPSnigLy12o0BtxsdgbBhFtKq93WOSTcEB966F/s5J8kIGD UkyM8RJxy1Mg8taLqUK4chQmOeLfjZm6A97+s+Okw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=fbbLzY0O vsFTWDrBKh82+ao7jr8=; b=kGZQyolmasgX9kEkMaw6HAb+ZkzHtU7ls3WY/UHJ aT/DqJQU+0E6KI+FhPUKv/Ow/1EkvyMcv/B70cg53SgkPOINymgidtwdzSW8HDXW VoOAygaHC+JAin/CvzSZM94el+mtil4wrn+5o4W8fkO0lbKkrFOtrJaiiW/cRtS1 MMI= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-yk0-f177.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.43.98 with SMTP id k62mr6852798yhb.33.1397062966549; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 10:02:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53457A4C.1050104@etr-usa.com> References: <6CF2FC1279D0844C9357664DC5A08BA2464FF5 AT MLBXV06 DOT nih DOT gov> <5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0C8B85C2 AT MLBXv04 DOT nih DOT gov> <20140408152118 DOT GB4595 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <5344236E DOT 8020503 AT aol DOT com> <20140408164902 DOT GD5812 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0C8B89AF AT MLBXv04 DOT nih DOT gov> <20140408181301 DOT GD2731 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20140409032833 DOT GA2351 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20140409055117 DOT GA1878 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <53457A4C DOT 1050104 AT etr-usa DOT com> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 12:02:46 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: We need steenking patches (Re: Cygwin kill utility...) From: Steven Penny To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I'll once again point out that gdb, binutils, and gcc seem to get by > just fine without this. And, maybe I missed something, but I don't see > search on sourceforge.net either. Given that, I don't see how this can > be a huge barrier to entry. Noted. However this is an irrelevant conclusion. The fact that they are successful does not mean Cygwin wont benefit from a search function. On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Warren Young wrote: > If you think web code repository searching and a public bug tracker are > primary barriers to contribution, you aren't being honest with yourself. > They are nice, but not necessary. I am honest with myself. I, as everyone have limited time. I will not waste my time with an archaic system and maintainers who fail to see the light of day when there are better ways I can spend my time, example http://github.com/stars/svnpenn -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple