X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=LA6tJl9peZatna3ng44y/W6lx/Kst EZ/P7xjjD+tAz95DR3wanhks9vSWHiO8d/oZzdh+rg64eqKm7in2Ib4aPxtm40pa TzuRuZwCzKUJGf6qmNbTTfTS87uCbYD21fzFVpPyMxTj0nN56P1ppBs85f0mKiAt QCKRaVjNkwKitI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; s=default; bh=aEpRXWzaLoJnrMFoIfaE9138IG8=; b=RFC sXkMnxx4XQweLvOWZXGnbeYn5wMSsaIgydj0VQ4YdsOcWzFMP9YcqOO8jpUglSRh ROSsnRyLOYu+vwuRkUygnNmfplniB+C1rnkLLBqbRg1pgwB0LVI9tE5dDMqCN+to Yc/T+CJl5WZ9czr7aa6L5vdQrAKSIf61ZBXghj8w= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wg0-f48.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.59.226 with SMTP id c2mr5354045wjr.6.1396981207373; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 11:20:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:20:07 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Mercurial 2.8 or 2.9? From: Ti Strga To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Upstream Mercurial is at 2.9.2, but looking in http://cygwin.com/packages/x86/mercurial/ there's only 2.5.x and 2.7.x. Are there plans to package a more recent release? Or alternatively, is there anything in particular holding them back? The only recent hits for mercurial that mnogosearch could find in the archives for the main cygwin and cygwin-apps lists were mentions in people's cygcheck output, but I don't know what's been discussed in other lists or IRC or etc. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple