DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=KPaKhWVPUop1aFCFjEJZr65hcYog0khLhrHHXkkjI/NmRhoNykpki
	KqFKOJ5REe/aXEmJhJgpTFmWOhuiCKXtLQz+jjoVFCSRsnM9yJW6tYS3JYQbhTVg
	5Mw6JtwDsHn/udkt9GK8JtTFOE0wRcb9oFdFchc4U/ADt1536Os4HQ=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:13:01 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: We need steenking patches (Re: Cygwin kill utility...)
Message-ID: <20140408181301.GD2731@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0C8AED9C AT MLBXv04 DOT nih DOT gov> <20140408031817 DOT GA1796 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0C8B4372 AT MLBXv04 DOT nih DOT gov> <20140408090129 DOT GC28755 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <6CF2FC1279D0844C9357664DC5A08BA2464FF5 AT MLBXV06 DOT nih DOT gov> <5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0C8B85C2 AT MLBXv04 DOT nih DOT gov> <20140408152118 DOT GB4595 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <5344236E DOT 8020503 AT aol DOT com> <20140408164902 DOT GD5812 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0C8B89AF AT MLBXv04 DOT nih DOT gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5F8AAC04F9616747BC4CC0E803D5907D0C8B89AF@MLBXv04.nih.gov>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 05:59:53PM +0000, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote:
>> The whole POINT of this thread was that we want patches.
>
>You've just killed that point, alright.  The change I was about, was
>merely a word-long (another keyword to be added), the discussion that
>sparkled was just despicable.

You are the guy who called my spam blocking software "stupid" so I
don't think your high ground is that elevated.

>The response was so earful, with profanities and teaching me (?) legal

I apologize for the implied profanity.  I very rarely go there but I do
find the confusion around these discussions pretty frustrating.  That is
not an excuse though.  I shouldn't have done it.

It is likely hard to put yourself in the shoes of developers running
a project but if we don't push back on people sending "suggestions" we
end up with a mailing list full of suggestions with people who expect
that their suggestions will be carried out.

It is a little known fact that one of Corinna's early messages was
actually a suggestion.  I suggested to *her* that a patch would be
considered.  She took that as a challenge and provided a patch.
Apparently Corinna is quite unique (we all know that now), at least as
far as the Cygwin ecosphere is concerned.

>Please spare yourself time responding to the above, I'm not going to
>read it.

Good luck in your future endeavors.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple