X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=l/PBWCmIFiR/HFPe 45JxAsOaA2PE8KKwIEvH4cRQH0zqGC8FS1An2TionH469BpyJL2+eIQz+aZk0isB XBARH715RkIksic1wMsK+KmncUofxJS5+PPNWqkXETb/ttuEG0kMj+tcHhJr0lKb 5NxDCmXDY69+ndxJAc9OZu4XyD8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=AhwYCVWCYiGgeABvfn4i4h uMgR4=; b=mzgsv5SNfFYAf1C2ytj4XS+FJ7dlgNbfI73/xRTq8RaV8ROhRG4DZs XP81lCOtXAbirOhNQWAAZ/BlvDXOE70LIK8YC6ou5My48J0Q23MIfhZ9ralSg3+N 2d5KQmmXTn7WdeaKYA2NWJju2iz9Ln7ZyiRoQrTVG6XeKJ2CZbhMw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: vms173021pub.verizon.net Message-id: <5342D299.1040101@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 12:30:17 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Trouble with running cygwin dll on Vortex86MX+ CPU References: <20140404083359 DOT GD2508 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140404113738 DOT GF2508 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140407112313 DOT GA17922 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-reply-to: <20140407112313.GA17922@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 4/7/2014 7:23 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Apr 7 11:08, Colin wrote: >> Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: >> >>> >>> On Apr 4 09:44, Colin wrote: >>>> Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: >>>> >>> >>> Alternatively, even though I hate to point people to older versions >>> of Cygwin, you could try the old Cygwin 1.5.25. I'm not quite sure, >>> but I think it was compiled for i586 or even i386. It's not as >>> feature-rich as Cygwin 1.7 but it worked, and maybe the set of >>> POSIX functions is sufficient for you. See the Cygwin time machine >>> at http://www.fruitbat.org/Cygwin/index.html#cygwincirca >>> >>> If you want to go even further back in time, then MSYS may be the >>> right thing for you. It's a rip-off of Cygwin 1.3.22 with a few >>> patches to supposedly building native executables a bit better. >>> Just make sure to grab the old MSYS, not the more recent MSYS2. >>> See http://www.mingw.org/wiki/MSYS >>> >>> HTH, >>> Corinna >>> >> >> Cygwin 1.5.25 seems like a good option. So I downloaded setup-legacy.exe >> from fruitbat and ran it on an XP machine which has not previously seen >> Cygwin. Initially I installed just the base Cygwin files. The process ran >> as expected, and installed 4,263 files in 472 folders. >> >> However the bash shell appears non-functional as far as external commands >> go. It presents a prompt bash-3.2$, if I type something like ls, it >> responds command not found. Any ideas? > > $PATH? Indeed. And if your path under bash doesn't include /usr/bin, then I'll wager your postinstall scripts didn't run or at least completely/correctly. See /etc/postinstall for the scripts. If you aren't able to figure out what didn't run properly, you can either try rerunning everything manually and looking for faults (if any) or just rerun setup.exe and hope that it has better luck with the scripts the second time around. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple