X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=noEvhsgUwVhJuCvzVLLBGLGOBvrIVgsdvqP41aEMDdz5R3dOWVtfH mW27QRdbDes6Kd7DGRuI94sje1Q5aghxUtH0zQgOqJI17yX3sJ9zDuY9olYvi6jt G7bDxrkpRPAMhQLFzcmg+Mxkg1ycEu5HxoSToXRmfM/5dYNmmKJnNM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=zfoMWsWdw9IGGNyIe4Z9RWXg/Nc=; b=Kgi1o4O4U0mZDMYvkK2Rbt7kVfbn yP2MK1g8cP5JkmD1wG3frj2KTOA9zlrWgA77171jEo02ZYUAYLyomcFWPbsrU06h 3K05yoh9f4ZIK/6L0ysjBa/JtJV+pZmbmSxcmsxMLmSOVMqz03BON1zoczerF7Bp V5Zi3EP55j9njEk= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Jean-Pierre Flori Subject: Re: Possibly wrong address passed to callq asm instruction within MPIR test binaries Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 11:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <20140402090750 DOT GP2508 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140407084312 DOT GA2061 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) X-IsSubscribed: yes Le Mon, 07 Apr 2014 10:43:30 +0000, Jean-Pierre Flori a écrit : >> >> Note in particular the __nm_ prefix. >> It is as advertiserd here: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-01/ >> msg00236.html But when looking at the Cygwin32 produced import lib, I >> don't see any nm prefix. > > In fact, I see some... but for much fewer functions, strange. I have troubles understanding when this _nm_ prefix actually gets added, any help welcome :) Is there any dark magic related to inlining? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple