X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=Jj5QK mEGyAFUC08RndASYf1sMRbYQZEEW/AaYWbuZ/rDJkGDnjXzyIwgf+DnBZNEnpGm9 yIVQHQ6zNwp3QTrzsCTwGUIsX7qb2raKhNL556WVYrUienUluUfF3RNZFMcyhBVo DZHkF0Nq/jL94Quyr2iA+2jpCKB/wkBhENWjhc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=/N8Jyer0OTt Zl/zvp/Z+bxeinwo=; b=J5fQNEipf/0IpS2Vhted+3cy3KBQ/mhg/eUH4s0HABn e1vqR/CxqfsXudTWPp/8PpBuTxTgVtYXQ3Nqaw78KCWEF9dhiLJg45dBw7D+x7hX CDiZUED8j8xy9jkeawuzXnGj1sgRe5Zh16CFkfY/uB48sXZOgsYsKrMH4bpeJpaQ = Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-in-08.arcor-online.net X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-16.arcor-online.net 1FC2682CD From: Achim Gratz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Possibly wrong address passed to callq asm instruction within MPIR test binaries References: <20140402090750 DOT GP2508 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 09:52:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Jean-Pierre Flori's message of "Sun, 6 Apr 2014 20:20:14 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: <87zjjxy3tg.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Jean-Pierre Flori writes: > The problem we recently encountered was the following: > in gmp-impl.h, mpn_store (which can be either a macro or a function if > efficient assembly is available, and so is always a function on x86_64) > was not marked __declspec(dllexport/dllimport). I can confirm that GMP has the same problem when I patch out these attributes (which I wanted to do because these cause lots of spurious warnings during compilation). This works fine on 32bit, but produces segmentation faults in some (not all) 64bit test binaries. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple