X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=X/lixD5EM7P1Iocz02WiZRBP5eYC+ZZJiK3yDAXeEv1CddGr6Jxbx wpgORivZRuuwJxXCIHJphHXO38+VIbHrg7rLEy4S8xiiC3FJeea/i8NRz/UbRbP2 5NJYW/eOgOXrUspapcrfm6XxL4N/j+iQcLxC4Ewsmulm+p90AIqb3g= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=c8nCaGrDrl5ySSdZDfK8CpY2vmQ=; b=Ra/qI5wEgHFE8yFPJUuUmEK7Q0sE LCcML4ZM/qLZszEeVNuEXROc4ehkevNCykkIZvuDCa9cS2WdUV4HZeirF5ZhsF5h lYvAiwkaqsbaPSaSN1reH16W5Dm8M2Wvki0bR2Q1EGDDJNEHaEH6ZTMT4TXTZzwC Galq/a+ah+59O/U= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Colin Subject: Re: Trouble with running cygwin dll on Vortex86MX+ CPU Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 09:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <20140404083359 DOT GD2508 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > > In discussing this with the embedded PC supplier, he suggests that the > > cygwin1.dll is exiting because it doesn't recognise the CPU. Is this > > explanation plausible? And if it is, is there a solution available, or > > must I give up on using cygwin for this application? > > As far as the pre-built Cygwin goes, I fear that you can't do a lot. > You could try to build Cygwin in i486 mode, and if that works, you have > to make sure to build applications against the newly built crt0.o and > libcygwin.a. But that's not all to keep in mind. When building > applications, parts of GCC are linked in as well, namely crtbegin.o and > crtend.o, and sometimes cyggcc_s-1.dll. All these may or may not use > post-i486 opcodes, so if push comes to shove you'd end up having to > rebuild GCC for i486 as well. > > I'm not trying to discourage you, but you might have a lot of > experimenting to do to get this working. > > Corinna > Thanks Corinna for this information. Now I understand the underlying issue and can decide how to move forward. Given that my application is not so big, I suspect that the pragmatic course will be to re-code it for Win32. Cheers, Colin -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple