X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=n1cD8mHiwelAE/Or 90uiJNdSMy8I6xxx80fR9T+Kfy0JFzWFv83JXSbj7TzVCOgqjF+jL1RwEtcWwuXR GYyt50McrmEx9OMKSM/NiuqyBnKqw5AK5QKdGSR+seYIV3GtiZj95gp9TElzsh4X yFYGdwbZM5iRzTbc/nPXOe0THTA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=kzpy8oKU6OOvOe8meMb81Y oAw5A=; b=oDHjD6QAlzt1/DmmdTlCbwvyztcxClWxTJnAh71ZHYJ84vWduHYNYz puQZQXS/m9DbwFEngdHGedQCC0PxerKQMo6W/fJZn2Lt1ynN4yxA8pIbV/3b1pHK Vay+7yozsR5ZpP4KmLsZ8GGMpPHv9kU86k+DmO0XJRPPKZKvALCQ8= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: vms173017pub.verizon.net Message-id: <53376E93.9050300@cygwin.com> Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 21:08:35 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Public key authorization problem with latest snapshot References: <5329B9D0 DOT 6070703 AT cornell DOT edu> <20140319160914 DOT GD2715 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5329C9EF DOT 1000305 AT cornell DOT edu> <20140319170508 DOT GF2715 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <885290127 DOT 20140320015843 AT yandex DOT ru> <20140320150258 DOT GD3729 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5336F3E3 DOT 5000402 AT cornell DOT edu> <20140329192928 DOT GB4316 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-reply-to: <20140329192928.GB4316@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 3/29/2014 3:29 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 12:25:07PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: >> On 3/20/2014 11:02 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> On Mar 20 01:58, Andrey Repin wrote: >>>> Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! >>>> >>>>> The code is now practically equivalent to what is in 1.7.28. Only the >>>>> VectoredContinueHandler, which was the reason Cygwin's exception handler >>>>> could be called twice, is not called anymore. Instead there's a vectored >>>>> exception handler which is only called during debugging. >>>> >>>>> Before: >>>> >>>>> if (!handler_installed) >>>>> { >>>>> handler_installed = true; >>>>> SetUnhandledExceptionFilter (handle); >>>>> AddVectoredContinueHandler (1, handle); >>>>> } >>>> >>>>> After: >>>> >>>>> if (!handler_installed) >>>>> { >>>>> handler_installed = true; >>>>> SetUnhandledExceptionFilter (handle); >>>>> AddVectoredExceptionHandler (1, handle_while_being_debugged); >>>>> } >>>> >>>>> If anybody can explain this weird behaviour, please educate me. >>>> >>>> I can't explain the behavior, but I could say, that setting >>>> "handler_installed = true;" before the handler is actually installed is not >>>> quite right. >>>> Unless that variable is used inside either of two functions called afterward, >>>> I would move it down to the end of `if' block. >>> >>> BTDT. This isn't the problem. I *may* have found the culprit today, >>> but I ripped apart a lot of the code so I'm not really sure yet. Stay >>> tuned. >> >> The problems I've reported seem to all be fixed in the latest snapshot >> (2014-03-29 15:21:43 UTC). Thanks! > > I'm sure Corinna will be happy to hear that. She put in LONG hours > getting that issue sorted out. > > I helped too, of course, by offering important "I don't like that > implementation" style feedback. It was one of those 50/50 collaborations > where one person does all the work and the other person mentions it on > a mailing list. Sounds exhausting. Perhaps you want to sit down. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple