X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=OPCAk6icfLho6Ugu6EpA2l+vh0gbkFTpJl2xhRmvcvwN4WxDS3kKh NxTw+z+vZdu3rAqi1xiCA69MiDMlZh4m6MVHATCmkHUNlC3MxXdP7LegTldaXsiE 5oN8VD8veSdJphEc0WWvwmX5c7Zb/3lGnnXK3b9U8OdHffasRslA9I= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=LvrRVbc+RoWbGD3s1cPM0NXoMUw=; b=mS5WUYIOLLHY64AzsTxQgTa+T9QB Z6b/FwrTsxVxSnYSL9JHsUceIWdihpievp6A5WPYSac+Z/XZqWVKGGHi/C0/UxEU TelakAS2A60q8NLqv8ShXs+LCp7dsyb7r/GDny6IhQvvqOO39VwXARCKmiXrodoV Rl+XEhM0E6Nd214= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19WoEU7i+B+qi4MjrO18BNT Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 15:29:28 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Public key authorization problem with latest snapshot Message-ID: <20140329192928.GB4316@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <5329B9D0 DOT 6070703 AT cornell DOT edu> <20140319160914 DOT GD2715 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5329C9EF DOT 1000305 AT cornell DOT edu> <20140319170508 DOT GF2715 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <885290127 DOT 20140320015843 AT yandex DOT ru> <20140320150258 DOT GD3729 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5336F3E3 DOT 5000402 AT cornell DOT edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5336F3E3.5000402@cornell.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 12:25:07PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: >On 3/20/2014 11:02 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Mar 20 01:58, Andrey Repin wrote: >>> Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! >>> >>>> The code is now practically equivalent to what is in 1.7.28. Only the >>>> VectoredContinueHandler, which was the reason Cygwin's exception handler >>>> could be called twice, is not called anymore. Instead there's a vectored >>>> exception handler which is only called during debugging. >>> >>>> Before: >>> >>>> if (!handler_installed) >>>> { >>>> handler_installed = true; >>>> SetUnhandledExceptionFilter (handle); >>>> AddVectoredContinueHandler (1, handle); >>>> } >>> >>>> After: >>> >>>> if (!handler_installed) >>>> { >>>> handler_installed = true; >>>> SetUnhandledExceptionFilter (handle); >>>> AddVectoredExceptionHandler (1, handle_while_being_debugged); >>>> } >>> >>>> If anybody can explain this weird behaviour, please educate me. >>> >>> I can't explain the behavior, but I could say, that setting >>> "handler_installed = true;" before the handler is actually installed is not >>> quite right. >>> Unless that variable is used inside either of two functions called afterward, >>> I would move it down to the end of `if' block. >> >> BTDT. This isn't the problem. I *may* have found the culprit today, >> but I ripped apart a lot of the code so I'm not really sure yet. Stay >> tuned. > >The problems I've reported seem to all be fixed in the latest snapshot >(2014-03-29 15:21:43 UTC). Thanks! I'm sure Corinna will be happy to hear that. She put in LONG hours getting that issue sorted out. I helped too, of course, by offering important "I don't like that implementation" style feedback. It was one of those 50/50 collaborations where one person does all the work and the other person mentions it on a mailing list. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple