X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=x+ 6IviEyO9+/Mr38x23Bp2Fr0Jn7jhXlz5m0qcg/WWyaZu9ltKmNmB9PtFeLhBIXSH 2qFTyD9Vn216yRc9upFnujYZ9hNUnW2QQ+Gp+6zDaeK9eZgj7YobaekVGQ1R2OfF 1oehF7TzHcCjDah9aDM7rBlwEaCEwakYtfh704jIc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=bV/jRG+U Dt6BDK6lgJxE/B3iAuI=; b=isYfXASFB1ZTJy2cN8EB1RjWis7+3QRVWJroKC/B OimUKkswVM620Qiq2q5Lh0nlTKT8/a0uLNja6tSBJYuDmJ66pxIDFBMNHbGTsyUV eKz4YKUCzedHKe8kukJ5DBQ+K/sZ13cQA+F1hIQbDtVsmw27XfoFrYPHTBXxbYTV +fY= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-qc0-f177.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.94.227 with SMTP id g90mr3705342qge.58.1396040815730; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 14:06:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53357393.60603@redhat.com> References: <20140328093110 DOT GA23367 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <0D835E9B9CD07F40A48423F80D3B5A702CE06F27 AT USA7109MB022 DOT na DOT xerox DOT net> <53357393 DOT 60603 AT redhat DOT com> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:06:55 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: open(O_RDWR) and lseek() fail From: Csaba Raduly To: cygwin list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 03/28/2014 06:53 AM, Nellis, Kenneth wrote: >> x.c:12:2: warning: format '%d' expects argument of type 'int', but argument 2 has type 'off_t' [-Wformat=] >> >> So, then, after changing %d to %lld, gcc -Wall -pedantic complains: > > My advice: You usually do NOT want to compile with -pedantic. That > option exists for programs that are sticking _strictly_ to the C > standard, but lseek() and off_t are not part of the C standard. There > is no portable way to be pedantic to the C89 standard I can be pedantic under any circumstances :) > and simultaneously > use 64-bit offsets. The situation is better in C99, since that > introduced 64-bit types. > > If you want to use %lld, you have to use C99, not C89; use gcc -std=c99 > or gcc -std=gnu99. By omitting -std, you got gcc's default, which for > now is still -std=c89. > >> Wondering how to printf an off_t value without the compiler complaining while >> using -Wall -pedantic. gcc -std=gnu89 -Wall -pedantic -Wno-long-long Then you have to cast size_t into unsigned long long and off_t into long long when printf'ing #include #include int main() { size_t x = 10; printf("%lld\n", (long long)x); return 0; } Csaba AT assos ~ $ gcc -Wall -pedantic -Wno-long-long pedant.c Csaba AT assos ~ $ Csaba -- GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++ The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers. Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts. "Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds "People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple