X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=huWw+TkynqkBtyOssXp/JmA3X1fu8mBDHkhfemicCCI 5bdNYqV2qzZmG02L8r2pAG+3QmyIXb55sb4Pzd0znWrc+vfgpKDJMF9Oe2LLvOZq fFDoZ9vd5lJk5QfQ21FIMK2M/4hnTwkjhfdNFJ9605Hf9N86/Co4WeOLy781AvOY = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=geLMXrrG+YMYO4I4L51YXMRzLVA=; b=qKiaTYqBhB6a9ZU8o GPLz2fhrlmx0nDcodslWHjNwPs5EKVauVyoHnn2Bpo6v5L0mr7UX0Q5fpNeueYy3 QsTU5z4S4GSgons00ES1ID4gopzPkgZHfh84gdSDw+iiornLGLKD2rvzEbz4Ov9z OK1P57lAnyH6T6Lri7/vjdi11o= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: Ishtar.tlinx.org Message-ID: <5331A503.1010504@tlinx.org> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 08:47:15 -0700 From: Linda Walsh User-Agent: Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: usefulness of symlinks References: <532CC553 DOT 9000700 AT tlinx DOT org> <20140324103627 DOT GB27624 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5330E56F DOT 8020805 AT tlinx DOT org> <53318EC6 DOT 80406 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> In-Reply-To: <53318EC6.80406@dronecode.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Jon TURNEY wrote: > > This really reads like you've tried one GLX client (glxgears), seen that it > apparently isn't working, and decided that GLX doesn't work at all. > > This is not true. Please stop spreading misinformation. ----- I'd like to see if there is ANY GLX program that works. I was under the impression that GLXGEARS was among the most basic, and it USED to work... ANY update of motion would have indicated something is working. I don't understand why glxgears would use indirect rendering when client and server are on the same machine. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple