X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=Afn40ryKLLRkPH5NPJsuRhiRmLwjsQdtjsJlLNUZaGC1yDK5ujguo yRlsgQgV6kcx2rsZjPLE8BcKKxtGFwpWXdiNYMOhCr7NlX+XpzFwKdAVKemwCHxL 8rfMJac03Wn4SYLjiom37Q5JZWNA3wvZWS+cJU+wGLHdKZaqN6VoGg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=WkLrxTxrDlDcOKKV50VPzsnw4os=; b=TtUBUR0FM1npqQMgNhpkuMN+WK51 RTuxJR1XRlE1rtM4ZcJZL84NyWMG4cUYX06SgaRkQkIz4s2ss8ygFQB3VYR+mTwr 1iuJiE/lqaLPt6Q8dz6F+kpJfy9GysBdBbKeYi0kAaSxiieInfkm2tWZuM8PjMSq IoEzB+lsIkAFLus= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX192/6wmt0BEGVbPcW6mn3TU Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:39:21 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.7.25, Windows 7: dumper doesn't generate core file Message-ID: <20140312043921.GA3271@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <531FD728 DOT 2000600 AT constrainttec DOT com> <531FDCA8 DOT 1040709 AT constrainttec DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <531FDCA8.1040709@constrainttec.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 03:03:52PM +1100, Sam Liapis AT constrainttec DOT com wrote: > >Thanks Corinna I appreciate the response. > >>>Question 2: IS THE CODE MODIFICATION AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM? > > > Maybe, but first it would be helpful if somebody could explain why > > sections should be able to overlap at all. That's puzzling me. > > > > As for patches, did you seehttp://cygwin.com/contrib.html > > For small, obvious patches, we don't need the copyright assignment. > > Rule of thumb is < 10 lines. > > > I'm happy to submit minor patches on both points covered in the >original post. > However as you noted I'll wait for someone to first explain if/why >sections overlap. I doubt we'll get an answer here. Possibly someone in the binutils mailing list would know but I think it's probably safe to assume that sections don't overlap. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple