X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=xGetR2r8+KV4Ek/Vy4W/O2i8gv+BfEJIgxTUB1IFGDNq62bnZdxeg
	jSZc8sIBKaOltOfkrcpOU6Yvgu+yeJh7dI4bWhC9DgVEXESs6fcuDGyU//Klpm87
	bO7sNejgip/w1/0X/PKc+GputnyK8I6T3//ixHcceDMhzRS7N1PlBI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=9mXTEXN7XPcSVspDGDrOUuj0ovM=; b=T5D3hyJPN0Lv215/nS84KvZZRcGw
	M3QM0hq/Bk/Qum9+Q7he7YzzknplhHFhc7GUoRSezmcF+YfrRjaeacYOghcogKj9
	mK04hlB56j5kKUg9WDDGdBx6eYG3w1qmKSqJdUsE1IqmrdIZtdoq8mrup6Vf4lwT
	iHPLPbCevfC5cSE=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 11:35:48 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygwin64 ignoring /etc/passwd shell field?
Message-ID: <20140307103548.GA2542@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <6f9492621546f3eeca905b6281314451 AT mykolab DOT ch> <530CAA5C DOT 8060505 AT cygwin DOT com> <530D10B2 DOT 7050506 AT jsbc DOT cc> <20140225215511 DOT GB6065 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <530D261C DOT 5000403 AT jsbc DOT cc> <530D2932 DOT 5010906 AT cygwin DOT com> <20140226100712 DOT GS2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <531489E4 DOT 3000704 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20140303150531 DOT GD2469 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5318CF17 DOT 40102 AT cornell DOT edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5318CF17.40102@cornell.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mar  6 14:40, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 3/3/2014 10:05 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Mar  3 08:55, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >>On 2/26/2014 5:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>>Weird, I was pretty sure we already have an /etc/shells file installed
> >>>by default.  Apparently not.  So, shan't we add one?
> >>>
> >>>   /bin/sh
> >>>   /bin/bash
> >>>   /bin/dash
> >>>   /bin/mksh
> >>>   /bin/zsh
> >>>   /usr/bin/sh
> >>>   /usr/bin/bash
> >>>   /usr/bin/dash
> >>>   /usr/bin/mksh
> >>>   /usr/bin/zsh
> >>>
> >>>The base-files package would be a good place to be.  David?
> >>
> >>Currently inetutils-server provides /etc/defaults/etc/shells. If
> >>that file is required by base functionality now, then I've no
> >>problem removing it and modifying inetutils' postinstall/preremove
> >>scripts. But we'll need to synchronize the uploads of
> >>inetutils-server-$next and base-files-$next.
> >>
> >>Speaking of base-files, version 4.1-2 has been in test now for over
> >>two years...works fine here and fixes a problem with $TEMP and other
> >>"standard" variable names: 4.1-1 set both $TEMP and $temp, but these
> >>are not distinguished by native processes, leading to confusion if a
> >>native process reset $TEMP (but not $temp).
> >
> >I had a problem when running it in an early stage of 64 bit development,
> >but I don't remember at all what the problem was.  Do you run it on
> >64 bit as well?
>=20
> I think this is what you're trying to remember:
>=20
>   http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-07/msg00114.html

Thanks for finding this one!  Unfortunately David has left us,
apparently.

Is anybody willing to take over maintainership of the base-files
package?


Thanks,
Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=Th2W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s--