X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Z+bbE7sjwbMDFNS5vwgdjIvf2cf72mZL2zOX6KZc9md 2XaBSJDQ7qvX5xwA0cLWy/lu1jmSIBPn2CLbQQPZdmAq3npUnJ0SAs9JC5ZECA3v Z/Y5V9TxzfujIvaOizMjbS8PO7Qceaemco5G4jdoG0mmqkkvkCryg7D5FFN1kFwo = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=8EgJSOjdgIluimIUwZ0EAEAQoQs=; b=FTUqNiPuI0kmRAgVt UhTKa2XA6xbfjjR6WIzuXkZEv9tFJqx3n33M2hUiO7+bhh11n4RSVzPkaV/VWP6d 6TcGT6xkUrWZknmXKEvRnfmjeG9Axyu3QHtZjEjAeq0QI2MteTKFjHgDVEn172uv aoSjueo/WBe9ag7EeoiQSw2Q7A= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: limerock01.mail.cornell.edu X-CornellRouted: This message has been Routed already. Message-ID: <5318CF17.40102@cornell.edu> Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:40:07 -0500 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin64 ignoring /etc/passwd shell field? References: <6f9492621546f3eeca905b6281314451 AT mykolab DOT ch> <530CAA5C DOT 8060505 AT cygwin DOT com> <530D10B2 DOT 7050506 AT jsbc DOT cc> <20140225215511 DOT GB6065 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <530D261C DOT 5000403 AT jsbc DOT cc> <530D2932 DOT 5010906 AT cygwin DOT com> <20140226100712 DOT GS2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <531489E4 DOT 3000704 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20140303150531 DOT GD2469 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20140303150531.GD2469@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 3/3/2014 10:05 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 3 08:55, Charles Wilson wrote: >> On 2/26/2014 5:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> Weird, I was pretty sure we already have an /etc/shells file installed >>> by default. Apparently not. So, shan't we add one? >>> >>> /bin/sh >>> /bin/bash >>> /bin/dash >>> /bin/mksh >>> /bin/zsh >>> /usr/bin/sh >>> /usr/bin/bash >>> /usr/bin/dash >>> /usr/bin/mksh >>> /usr/bin/zsh >>> >>> The base-files package would be a good place to be. David? >> >> Currently inetutils-server provides /etc/defaults/etc/shells. If >> that file is required by base functionality now, then I've no >> problem removing it and modifying inetutils' postinstall/preremove >> scripts. But we'll need to synchronize the uploads of >> inetutils-server-$next and base-files-$next. >> >> Speaking of base-files, version 4.1-2 has been in test now for over >> two years...works fine here and fixes a problem with $TEMP and other >> "standard" variable names: 4.1-1 set both $TEMP and $temp, but these >> are not distinguished by native processes, leading to confusion if a >> native process reset $TEMP (but not $temp). > > I had a problem when running it in an early stage of 64 bit development, > but I don't remember at all what the problem was. Do you run it on > 64 bit as well? I think this is what you're trying to remember: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-07/msg00114.html Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple