X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=sCHunHrotymhdIG1
	1bBIPImMbE9bxkVitKgvtQC1phrgv2KAGpItCLqauYyoYcoOhUd5MFWCzd3255Oo
	CkAhqIOxyv1FC9GiU2HIoAaEmR1jwPUHfwp5wJGD28ZEy9G9lTBIVj8Kjda0lyov
	Yk0k30aKRiwTDKWThCyV676YRgM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=akgU5b0GVbc5QfkqXnIU88
	p5BMU=; b=RGqBRFhc2q8a4t/6YwxdrlinGV2HqDhLiE6dxHV0DOx0bIk9v1EZKK
	WaSDSPWFzqQn12wUBCqsQWMmsMHg7S6uCt5fnJCOIkfcAD0nTTYiIvtHvaZOqLEh
	YX1g8Tprg8NF1GZcw5LJbsTKhzizGn4H6OOdQekz4a5AkxNGd5R2g=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: smtpback.ht-systems.ru
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 00:44:12 +0400
From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <1863536246.20140304004412@yandex.ru>
To: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Testers needed:  New passwd/group handling in Cygwin
In-Reply-To: <20140303150746.GE2469@calimero.vinschen.de>
References: <loom DOT 20140227T095414-414 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <loom DOT 20140227T100638-8 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20140227094951 DOT GD2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20140227T134714-188 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20140227134632 DOT GG2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <765945729 DOT 20140228031219 AT yandex DOT ru> <20140228120748 DOT GN2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1244251265 DOT 20140301020854 AT yandex DOT ru> <20140303092352 DOT GB26619 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <231682974 DOT 20140303184701 AT yandex DOT ru> <20140303150746 DOT GE2469 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!

>> I'd need to test it in domain environment,

And with sane number of groups (less than 20), the results are barely
different between different caching strategies (less than 1%, which could
easily be explained by measurement error), except (again) for the case of
runing `id' under "db_cache: no", which takes approximately twice as long, as
any other way. 

If you ask me, the choice is between "db_cahce: yes" and "db_cache: full", and
I don't have solid reason to prefer one over another. Not running with remote
connection to the domain here...


--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru) 04.03.2014, <00:33>

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple