X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=QoYY
	s+8hsjiT40g5o3+csDXY8U3sbafLA7jbHGOH0dDePw5MDKvPXY+MyqCbtVaW7RVR
	QaOv5hU6zX15lwpeVAGsG7xZpTHFW+s4fD+K6DcWqN6BM0Aju7hhW8CKEmfssN+K
	Ngu/YfW+sGSXoYFcW5ZVql76MjHlZTWZrM/nHMY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=FAQDz9R7ro
	tsk+91+FNQlIlEXtM=; b=vKuKqMKBrZKmCx2p4Qi14+ge4gjPpW6V3RaKYNcX/g
	N3Jdy4fMWY+cldoysEXfmtXow7UmZoyxZqseiIIiKtWFeUi8717n0/M8IaDqHGVa
	lh1Zmu1q1GXqHHVuAoSvTgegOBsR66eRT8pjbiOKl+wdU99XV8eynnEDx+E20Aob
	4=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 16:07:46 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Testers needed:  New passwd/group handling in Cygwin
Message-ID: <20140303150746.GE2469@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <loom DOT 20140227T095414-414 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <loom DOT 20140227T100638-8 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20140227094951 DOT GD2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <loom DOT 20140227T134714-188 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <20140227134632 DOT GG2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <765945729 DOT 20140228031219 AT yandex DOT ru> <20140228120748 DOT GN2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1244251265 DOT 20140301020854 AT yandex DOT ru> <20140303092352 DOT GB26619 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <231682974 DOT 20140303184701 AT yandex DOT ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3Pql8miugIZX0722"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <231682974.20140303184701@yandex.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

--3Pql8miugIZX0722
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mar  3 18:47, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Corinna Vinschen!
>=20
> >> > I've just uploaded a new snapshot to http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
> >>=20
> >> I've sent a reply with testing details, but it may have been caught by=
 SPAM
> >> deflection for "excess use of foreign language".
> >> Please disregard this notification, if a message will finally come thr=
ough.
> >>=20
> >> > Please try it out.  Average timings from your environment (process
> >> > startup, and calling `id') would be nice.
> >>=20
> >> Oh, and I thought of a way to test only invocation times.
> >> I ran /bin/true alot...
> >>=20
> >> db_cache: no
> >> Timer 2  Elapsed: 0:00:00,75
> >> Stable (+-0.2 regardless of current credentials.)
> >>=20
> >> db_cache: yes
> >> Timer 2  Elapsed: 0:00:00,85 (current user)
> >> Timer 2  Elapsed: 0:00:00,75 (different user)
> >> Unstable results. (I.e. vary by ~.10 in both cases.)
> >>=20
> >> Default caching settings.
> >> Timer 2  Elapsed: 0:00:01,15
> >> Unstable results. (I.e. vary by ~.15 or more in all cases.)
>=20
> > So the process start takes 0.3 secs extra for you.  Is that feasible?
> > Would you rather keep the new "db_cache" setting as an option?  What
> > do you think is the best default, objectively spoken?
>=20
> I could never notice it. And it's not 0.3 sec, it's closer to 0.005sec (t=
he
> cycle was run about sixty times, so, divide approptely)
> I'd need to test it in domain environment, but I don't have access to one=
 with
> Cygwin installed right now. Or, perhaps, I do?... let me check something.

Sure.

> In the meantime, I see my previous mail was indeed caught in the middle. =
I'll
> repost it with a link to test results.

Nah, never mind.  I'm more interested of your experiences than in
dry numbers :)


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--3Pql8miugIZX0722
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=hVJD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3Pql8miugIZX0722--