X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=PsQ+Ak1sEDJ9Yj8ClYHJvZDgwTLETlb+1ASQT+iGhCo xmkB7axg4YdxQKLMNBdALY7HUtM9OgMEdV6LkIOKi5rgcz8OC+qOfk/vOM6fciFV uSX2sIaORs5AuhLMnAtvNCHsUstVbYMtCZK9tzY9k1QUUU82yUvMocI3iV9zpH/k = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=ner8MJZ3o1Xv0wNHSGT51WgDzE0=; b=MiGnmD1vNt1LT6izG TpKKOivmJGrnnYJRuxEKuLgAqrPojN3aj0TWVb77EeGxUH876x+ZKvY5hkcikyni XLpEw3rZPMDSo9HHyIpfAwc9dqS13K3gtXsJGB960V5F+eROeHwmOokaKFFkG7eG bDYRySe5tJYtZFyJxNYOgauymg= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_COUK,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: out.ipsmtp3nec.opaltelecom.net X-SMTPAUTH: drstacey AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAFL3ElNV0kxR/2dsb2JhbAANTcItgwyBKIMZAQEBBDhAEQsSBgkWDwkDAgECATcOEwgBAbIhoSsXjmAWhCIErhQ X-IPAS-Result: ApMBAFL3ElNV0kxR/2dsb2JhbAANTcItgwyBKIMZAQEBBDhAEQsSBgkWDwkDAgECATcOEwgBAbIhoSsXjmAWhCIErhQ Message-ID: <5312F78F.1090508@tiscali.co.uk> Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 09:19:11 +0000 From: David Stacey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Unpacking 7z archives on Cygwin64 References: <73E88645491D4727952D7C498CF24DA7 AT TKsamsung> In-Reply-To: <73E88645491D4727952D7C498CF24DA7@TKsamsung> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 02/03/14 07:26, Tony Kelman wrote: > I'm still not clear, do 64 bit packages have their own independent > set of patches, or is it necessary to write patches that work for > both 32 bit and 64 bit? This is really up to the package maintainer. Personally, I prefer to have one cygport file and patch set that builds both sources. I test uname(1) if I need something specific for one architecture. This means that I can keep my cygport files and patches in version control and have two instances checked out, one for each architecture. It also means that the source tarball is generic. The downside is that I can't cross-compile. However, I'm sure that there are a number of maintainers who will do things differently. On the subject of maintainers, p7zip does have one; it is really up to Mr. Wilson to prepare a 64-bit version whenever he is ready to do so. I'm sure he'll appreciate the work that you've done in getting this far. That said, we have precedent for some 'non-maintainer uploads' for 64-bit, just to make up the numbers and fill some important gaps. Cheers, Dave. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple