X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=fTrxm63twIWcLULq 50CqTh0AaXQXtPKhRosKf6PyATgWdqYxReqdwRNIAS9fF42o+FIW0cHl4nLhMyz2 EpE2G/bx12mokKgdMykJeSIPCly7CFQUrRdxxND2OO/TGByKvEItc2AzuXZ1MpOF Y385EyzgXwTFGAM+MhsSIolVFmI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=OFxmfxO1MJyRfQpuMZ0pTO CCEQ8=; b=Nw2bHCIKxkhgn+1iUG4gFo34grJ7a/VFKYatDxHHy8hIDSNH56PgX5 p8GX2icTCe5XjTE64wopXpSiU/P8nF3mlo6F+RqCJlA+PRyKbHEqTcgPUwKMGmJS 08fZFZYyhZ83WLnudHClGl0RhM6AkrB2/qyG4Fr0F1mk+wUo7cNy8= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: vms173025pub.verizon.net Message-id: <5310AFE4.5030702@cygwin.com> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:48:52 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: new setup.exe - another problem, or is this behavior expected? References: <530FCBE1 DOT 5080405 AT cygwin DOT com> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 2/28/2014 10:05 AM, carolus wrote: > On 2/27/2014 5:36 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > , if you start one session of setup, select a >> package, download it, and don't install it (for whatever reason), then >> start another setup session and do the same thing with a with a different >> mirror, you'll get the same package again under a different directory tree >> (the root of that tree being loosely named after the mirror you chose). > > Does this mean that install-from-internet is a better choice than > download-without-installing when the connection is apt to be broken? Or for > combining several overnight runs to cope with a slow connection? Currently > I'm downloading to an external USB drive which I then use to reinstall > Cygwin on several machines. > > And thanks for the explanation. Either should work OK, as the former is a superset of the latter. The key thing is to not pick more than 1 mirror if you don't need to. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple