X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=VORhUBYhPE2V1Fly 3j2NliAAlkNUzETbkmhPS2FdiFVPsC+G8KEoysGx6EsEOG3s/TUSfGni6Khw9IpV 9whEEDr7GABdmrkJHmqzb76BNTkNOdwYW3QVWE9Jixa5ellUo07qfJUQveRHfgPf r4NqQW3DENvQanvEQBf0lrfGDUA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=AQhWTITlcL21AtzHgw+aDu qgGR0=; b=MylK/UJAM1sdm+Lxin9VQWwrGwRpLRWqXdmprbObZZEeIDcDWGWYrI FAfe/ZgFDh2m11lHlYCyYaszgZaDy6qGTHkegCx/UCppKcW9moGqG0XiMRyon0Nx bVsTNXKHKPjXbZMxf/ROAwZ9nhT3lu+O3Z4MepNS2sNKo9c+vYmTY= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: vms173017pub.verizon.net Message-id: <530FCBE1.5080405@cygwin.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:36:01 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: new setup.exe - another problem, or is this behavior expected? References: In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 2/27/2014 12:44 PM, carolus wrote: > On my last download, a few days ago, when the initial server became > unresponsive, the setup process simply hung up even though I had selected > several alternate servers. After waiting a while, I terminated and > restarted the process but again the process hung up. I had to remove the > offending server from the selected list to get the download to proceed. > However, when I did so, it downloaded a lot of duplicates of files already > downloaded from the failed server. > > This is not what I expected on the basis of past experience, but the > installation instructions simply state: "You can select multiple mirrors by > holding down CTRL and clicking on each one." with no explanation of the > expected consequences. > > I asked for an explanation but have gotten no response: > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-02/msg00596.html Good that you persevered then. :-) I do believe the point of supporting multiple server selections is to allow you to add servers with differing package sets. Cygport comes to mind. If you're choosing multiple Cygwin mirror servers and expecting fault tolerance, I'm afraid you're looking for allot more than setup's equipped to deliver. ;-) In addition, if you start one session of setup, select a package, download it, and don't install it (for whatever reason), then start another setup session and do the same thing with a with a different mirror, you'll get the same package again under a different directory tree (the root of that tree being loosely named after the mirror you chose). So the moral to the story is that you shouldn't select more than 1 mirror unless you know there's something in one that's not in the other and preferably there's no overlap. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple