X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=MB1O4LmjxV4q8+tvoMSPkw1ZDWk0yX+OeRJANjw0N4IBLgEfDu5Va XbqIq96M8uBGaOXaNkEzl6L5keECnyOIQK3TENHlNEA3TQ9GjUl19sRiWLfuNw3y XbWDCTVMp4gRynxN1J5uv8+mTj1Y11PU0XayNh8dXeumyHCDwk4b/M= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=3ovvxUn8CRCxupczcvb4YzU0C/k=; b=YXlhQ5mRY0ZhwRZcIrdZw3oYSfRH fXNGGC57qY9AJdzuCETvMGnhHKpzXRbDX8MtUpVjkMH1wZ+NvWmRSBF7UryDHvQK W7tFt0iV/vHO7LMrLzd82lieqvvoCTB/HmL/RQLrR91XJ9I4sOjI9RYevBO/gO+Y L/TB8wnqSyqlRjA= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/QHM3SAGyZnlllyYqMGwJ8 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:29:36 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin64 ignoring /etc/passwd shell field? Message-ID: <20140227002936.GB5186@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <530CAA5C DOT 8060505 AT cygwin DOT com> <530D10B2 DOT 7050506 AT jsbc DOT cc> <20140225215511 DOT GB6065 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <530D261C DOT 5000403 AT jsbc DOT cc> <530D2932 DOT 5010906 AT cygwin DOT com> <20140226100712 DOT GS2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <530E7E8A DOT 1070303 AT jsbc DOT cc> <530E80E7 DOT 6060201 AT jsbc DOT cc> <530E83DC DOT 9090109 AT lysator DOT liu DOT se> <20140227002659 DOT GA5186 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140227002659.GA5186@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:26:59PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >The common case would be for a shell to show up in /etc/shells. Under >Fedora adds the shell to /etc/shells when the shell package is >installed. I don't see any reason for us to do anything different. Rephrasing that in English: Under Fedora, shells add themselves to /etc/shells file when they are installed. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple