X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=S2N0yGw6v9idwy6oN2VaxPx9t92ugg02ozXebmDgkJ4
	z6NBLhhPzaQ8swckjVj0HKwVkitqW1b++k9o2LDxnk9LWf/+WbzYmygWJtdApc1x
	9mzgTwyWUjOtFMlJNyCO3FjpTy2/TB+YVpLq7KRe9twDHmDJzUb88slEKvq3IfgU
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=saVkea9Qn3+9UMhwaPPeF2ahyIo=; b=XvZENVot5FXeypwv1
	eRrA/RZpuFJwmS/JIqZgb6lGQMW6axJKt0V3nErigoPrzSDqGxx0llvetrQVXpJd
	qK5Iput1he8Pry/xCtLMplbQfpp+LYuFXwO1yOUHzBApnIDMhDT4r0gE+nbItNjt
	Tgw9yvtVaCj7AltOOjeZQqeceA=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: gts.jsbc.cc
Message-ID: <530E80E7.6060201@jsbc.cc>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:03:51 -0800
From: Jim Burwell <jimb AT jsbc DOT cc>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygwin64 ignoring /etc/passwd shell field?
References: <6f9492621546f3eeca905b6281314451 AT mykolab DOT ch> <530CAA5C DOT 8060505 AT cygwin DOT com> <530D10B2 DOT 7050506 AT jsbc DOT cc> <20140225215511 DOT GB6065 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <530D261C DOT 5000403 AT jsbc DOT cc> <530D2932 DOT 5010906 AT cygwin DOT com> <20140226100712 DOT GS2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <530E7E8A DOT 1070303 AT jsbc DOT cc>
In-Reply-To: <530E7E8A.1070303@jsbc.cc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 2/26/2014 15:53, Jim Burwell wrote:
> On 2/26/2014 02:07, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Feb 25 18:37, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>> On 2/25/2014 6:24 PM, Jim Burwell wrote:
>>>> On 2/25/2014 13:55, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 25 13:52, Jim Burwell wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've noticed after installing an update the Cygwin64 appears to ignore
>>>>>> the contents of the shell field in /etc/passwd.  I normally run
>>>>>> /bin/tcsh as my shell, and changing this field used to result in any new
>>>>>> login shells running tcsh.  Now it just runs bash regardless.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Has something changed?
>>>>> No.  Works for me.  Do you start `mintty -'?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Corinna
>>>>>
>>>> Interestingly, it works as expected with mintty, but not with xterm,
>>>> uxterm, uterm.
>>>>
>>>> Was going to try rxvt, but noticed it's not in Cygwin64.
>>>>
>>>> It also works when I ssh into my cygwin.
>>>>
>>>> So appears to be a problem with xterm and related?
>>> Yes, and it's a conscious change.  See
>>> <https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-xfree/2014-02/msg00005.html>.
>> Weird, I was pretty sure we already have an /etc/shells file installed
>> by default.  Apparently not.  So, shan't we add one?
>>
>>   /bin/sh
>>   /bin/bash
>>   /bin/dash
>>   /bin/mksh
>>   /bin/zsh
>>   /usr/bin/sh
>>   /usr/bin/bash
>>   /usr/bin/dash
>>   /usr/bin/mksh
>>   /usr/bin/zsh
>>
>> The base-files package would be a good place to be.  David?
>>
> Well, at least it wasn't a subconscious decision.  :-)
>
> Thanks for the pointer!
>
> I agree.  Every distro should have a default /etc/shells with the
> typical shells in it.
>
>
>
> - Jim
>
>
Or on second thought, the shells themselves should run a post install
which add themselves to /etc/shells.

- Jim


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple