X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=n1s2i
	YxCMxljQ04t9qeOG6btYuOz5RTMfoyYamSz1luZbGq0IZZPele7TT0XEvEU8u1ZL
	D3rLwO+RnQoRvh6IknSHowK6r3PrUzbSr066/H36yrEEFdkzImc+QPWDSj757lpO
	pHyGUa7vdp8mV4hKRV+P0HmXyMevDWpGFMJcxk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=0EvW80+69vJ
	TMdGFBfee70ZjlD4=; b=vt7pcF+liOmm9hZkJWbz3my3TkFGUauK7iKAX85Bsvk
	Th71UkQrKvEVUxeL7SIZb6h1OYK6T0InavaB+0xaU3j/PG7wgOpap1gFF/XxxLvN
	haFtSEevkTObVVMhnbHbPINuNbKCNIgWOUg0jBm83EqL1AbX3nSHJikuugQiaPN4
	=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-in-02.arcor-online.net
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-17.arcor-online.net 7ACD1CBC2C
From: Achim Gratz <Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: setup.exe bad signatures?
References: <0A03B892A1F8E14C8D9E8DCB832005284FEEFF2A AT EX2010-MAIL1 DOT WIZARD DOT PVT>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:13:57 +0100
In-Reply-To: <0A03B892A1F8E14C8D9E8DCB832005284FEEFF2A@EX2010-MAIL1.WIZARD.PVT>	(Michael Ryan's message of "Wed, 26 Feb 2014 03:09:04 +0000")
Message-ID: <87ppm9k7pm.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Michael Ryan writes:
> I'm trying to verify the signatures on the latest setup.exe files and I'm finding that they don't match:
>
> $ gpg --verify setup-x86.exe.sig
> gpg: Signature made Fri 13 Dec 2013 17:24:37 GMT using DSA key ID 676041BA
> gpg: BAD signature from "Cygwin <Cygwin AT cygwin.com>"
> $ gpg --verify setup-x86_64.exe.sig
> gpg: Signature made Fri 13 Dec 2013 17:38:14 GMT using DSA key ID 676041BA
> gpg: BAD signature from "Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin.com>"
> $ md5sum setup-x86*
> 93ee19b4143133ec0d9462a27e5c92cb  setup-x86_64.exe
> 2f2d2a21916b164c9f844810ada0f5f5  setup-x86_64.exe.sig
> 9b3e9b26fa040763f2673cc3dc0cf229  setup-x86.exe
> 3afb815ce823e601f999de777ea72885  setup-x86.exe.sig
>
> Am I doing something wrong, or...?

Probably not, those signatures are still referring to the previous
setup.exe files if you believe the date.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple