X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=cLhyewdAgM66p7sR
	w0wrnOW0hmVwEqB8Zz4m30+Mz9jFS5hLso+Vqcou4m56PlY0ikR7EnrNN9NPsqaP
	MFl2OF6CeYdJV9rQy6XUlRzbOBf038US3W7MJLx2I93BZKmaPoBMaWK9P7SqCiAI
	6FPFzCOZKTLtTJZre9X7spMnurs=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=qbt7N9XwylGucgdVQnNyHq
	tOWpg=; b=vLSN0iHH6vFi0/rI4u/7k2AeQGhArvG28Lbp5CqW6c0fFKfqO/Dq38
	fHAc9Rm7F6ZyEre0LTYRcI+TZnvzXBlYXZKyvNLEB6cpqIM8KGkpz3pJUxeCl9Su
	ECtdn8lxTSUpSXxj1fDmZqiTwa+/+ThqRlO1nxHc/ZfJl0EcimlB8=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: smtpback.ht-systems.ru
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 19:04:37 +0400
From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <1076957186.20140219190437@yandex.ru>
To: "J.H. vd Water" <henri DOT van DOT de DOT water AT xs4all DOT nl>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin
In-Reply-To: <50d82a8f1a79bf80e57e32d94078227e.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>
References: <50d82a8f1a79bf80e57e32d94078227e DOT squirrel AT webmail DOT xs4all DOT nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Greetings, J.H. vd Water!

>>> Both cases show the same output:
>>>
>>> $ ./lsa
>>> pdom name: <WORKGROUP> dnsname: <(null)>, sid: 0x0
>>> adom name: <XP> sid: 0x246058

> I "lied" here :-) The non-admin case showed: ... sid: 0x246060
> (So, almost the same)

Yeah, I understand, they supposed to be different.
Mine's also different, but results show data similar to yours.

> But who will still be using XP within a company after after april 2014?'. So, does
> have XP priority? Your decision, of course ...

We will. Because we're not going to go over a headache of reinstalling
everything just because some jerk out in the world decided we should.
It's just not worth the money spent. Even if you ignore the cost of new OS
itself.

>>I'm going to make some tests on XP, but if I can't track this down,
>>would you mind if I send you a test Cygwin DLL with extended debug
>>output to help tracking it down?

> The best thing to do, I believe, if you want to fix 'XP' (my machine may turn out
> to be a "misfit").

> However, I have started afresh with the 18/2 snapshot ...

> Same result: getpwent crashed (db_enum: local) ... getgrent is ok.

> Send me a cygwin1.dll? Ok, if you tell me how to handle the thing (i.e. include
> some pointers to documents that I must read in order to be able to get results).

I'm volunteering as well. And I'm a bit more sure of my system conditions >.>


--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru) 19.02.2014, <18:58>

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple