X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:subject:from:to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=JA0 MxKjhyWz4Ln0xZ0HBDcQgxBoRl/9gylcTGunQF37BvbBoeHO4x0WUbDAsD/IsNFV UXhBwXqk7pyIBWL+uFzx2NhucWEt8whret5iy8wmnXGq7JKJfIswNfQ5lZESXdgJ LKYzNbSh4jAEV8Q6FkLTCXu7MoLtVN3Yf9/anrL0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:subject:from:to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=152RgHovQ BhvBkwfV3Kff1LOF1E=; b=yB7ppPXu4C7Q8gBoU+4GvL87a0XxotybNRPF4lKyk 42PbmSd3F0TEw5fd2NDtrcHAOxUGkO0vLrMbTMx44YMtTLe9xMBJG7Lwj1PcKFkS kqsfrL2l+lu1CpyZvU8hNSclyZcl0mwvunKKc7gh0gENw2iRWmDBtNeskHdsC18Y 1s= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl Message-ID: <7f134d1561781b92212eb45350009593.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:44:29 +0100 Subject: Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin From: "J.H. vd Water" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Corinna, >> After I had set up /etc/nsswitch.conf as follows >> >> db_enum: files >> >> the output of getpwent and getgrent looked "familiar" to me. (though the >> output of 'id' is not). > >In how far? Did you read my text in terms of how user and group names >are created? The leading separator char for builtin groups is an SFU Read and understand your text completely? No. >thingy. If it's too disturbing we can discuss changing that, but right >now I'm still looking for some kind of similarity. What I meant was: The output of 'id' in my "regular setup" shows: @@# id uid=1003(Henri) gid=513(None) groups=513(None),0(root),544(Administrators),545(Users) The output of 'id' in the "test setup" shows: $ id uid=1003(Henri) gid=513(None) groups=513(None),0(root),545(Users),4(+INTERACTIVE),\ 11(+AuthenticatedUsers),4095CurrentSession),66048(+LOCAL) To me the second output is different - but perhaps it is not. Henri -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple